Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.36, No.2, 186-190, 2019
Phenolic compound extraction from spent coffee grounds for antioxidant recovery
As the popularity of coffee beverage increases, an upsurge in the amount of solid residue, known as spent coffee ground (SCG), is inevitable. Currently, SCG is disposed of in the form of solid waste. However, there is a considerable amount of some valuable compounds including phenolic compounds in SCG. In this work, SCG was adopted as a natural antioxidant source for recovering phenolic compounds by an extraction method. An aqueous ethanol solvent (30% v/v) was used at different conditions of temperature, extraction time, and liquid/solid ratio. The amounts of phenolic compounds were analyzed by the well-known Folin-Ciocalteu method, and values were expressed as the weight of gallic acid equivalent (GAE). The highest extraction yield (87.3%) was reported at the highs of process variables; temperature=60 °C, extraction time=150 min, and liquid/solid ratio=50mL/g, based on a full factorial experimental design. The statistical Student’s t-test applied to the three operating factors revealed that temperature and liquid/solid ratio are more significant than the extraction time. A correlation equation was proposed to quantitatively analyze the effect of the factors on the reduction yield which could be further used to design and optimize the extraction process.
[References]
  1. ICO, International Coffee Organization, www.ico.org (accessed May 25 2018).
  2. Bertrand B, Guyot B, Anthony P, Lashermes P, Theor. Appl. Genet., 107, 378, 2003
  3. Clarke R, Vitzhum OG, Coffee: Recent Developments, Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford UK (2001).
  4. Cruz R, Cardoso MM, Fernandes L, Oliveira M, Mendes E, Baptista P, Morais S, Casal S, J. Agric. Food Chem., 60, 7777, 2012
  5. Silva MA, Nebra SA, Silva MJM, Sanchez CG, Biomass Bioenerg., 14(5-6), 457, 1998
  6. Leifa F, Pandey A, Soccol CR, J. Basic Microbiol., 40, 187, 2000
  7. Franca AS, Oliveira LS, Ferreira ME, Desalination, 249(1), 267, 2009
  8. Tokimoto T, Kawasaki N, Nakamura T, Akutagawa J, Tanada S, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 281(1), 56, 2005
  9. Utomo HD, Hunter KA, Environ. Technol., 27, 25, 2006
  10. Leifa F, Pandey A, Soccol CR, Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol., 44, 205, 2001
  11. Cruz R, Baptista P, Cunha S, Pereira JA, Casal S, Molecules, 17, 1535, 2012
  12. Mussatto SI, Machado EMS, Carneiro LM, Teixeira JA, Appl. Energy, 92, 763, 2012
  13. Oliveira LS, Franca AS, Camargos RRS, Ferraz VP, Bioresour. Technol., 99(8), 3244, 2008
  14. Al-Hamamre Z, Foerster S, Hartmann F, Kroger M, Kaltschmitt M, Fuel, 96(1), 70, 2012
  15. Campos-Vega R, Loarca-Pina G, Vergara-Castaneda H, Oomach BD, Trends Food Sci. Technol., 45, 24, 2015
  16. Esquivel P, Jimenez VM, Food Res. Int., 46, 488, 2012
  17. Hegde P, Agrawal P, Gupta PK, J. Environ. Res. Develop., 10, 547, 2016
  18. Li AN, Li S, Zhang YJ, Xu XR, Chen YM, Li HB, Nutrients, 6, 6020, 2014
  19. Clifford MN, Food Chem., 4, 63, 1979
  20. Xiong C, Sun Y, Du J, Chen W, Si Z, Gao H, Tang X, Zeng X, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 35(6), 1312, 2018
  21. Vuksanovic J, Kijevcanin ML, Radovic IR, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 35(7), 1477, 2018
  22. Mojzer EB, Hrncic MK, Skerget M, Knez Z, Bren U, Molecules, 21, 901, 2016
  23. Mussatto SI, Ballesteros LF, Martins S, Teixeira JA, Sep. Purif. Technol., 83, 173, 2011
  24. Zuorro A, Lavecchia R, J. Clean Prod., 34, 49, 2012
  25. Pavlovic MD, Buntic AV, Siler-Marinkovic SS, Dimitrijevic-Brankovic SI, Sep. Purif. Technol., 118, 503, 2013
  26. Singleton VL, Rossi JA, Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 16, 144, 1965
  27. Agbor GA, Vinson JA, Donnelly PE, Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. Diet., 3, 147, 2014
  28. Ramalakshmi K, Rao LJM, Takano-Ishikawa Y, Goto M, Food Chem., 115, 79, 2009
  29. Anderson M, Whitcomb P, “DOE Simplified: Practical Tools for Effective Experimentation,” 3rd Ed., CRC Press (2015).
  30. Mee R, “A Comprehensive Guide to Factorial Two-Level Experimentation”, Springer (2009).