Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.35, No.5, 1073-1082, 2018
Hydrodynamics and design of gas distributor in large-scale amine absorbers using computational fluid dynamics
A gas phase three-dimensional (3D) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was developed to investigate the hydrodynamics of gas distributors used in an amine absorber with a diameter of 3.2m. A standard gas inlet, tubular injectors with short, medium and long lengths, and a Schoepentoeter were considered as feed systems of the gas distributors. The pressure drop, dead-area ratio and coefficient of distribution at the packing entry were used as the performance indexes of the gas distributors. The down-pipe as a liquid collector exhibited a lower dead-area ratio when compared with that of the down-comer. The tubular gas injector with a short length reduced the dead-area ratio and the gas maldistribution. The Schoepentoeter was associated with the lowest pressure drop, dead-area ratio, and coefficient of distribution among the gas distributors. The uniformity of gas distribution was enhanced by 25% in the Schoepentoeter when compared to that of the tubular gas injector.
[References]
  1. Mondal MK, Balsora HK, Varshney P, Energy, 46(1), 431, 2012
  2. Wang M, Lawal A, Stephenson P, Sidders J, Ramshaw C, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 89(9A), 1609, 2011
  3. Lee JH, Kwak NS, Lee IY, Jang KR, Lee DW, Jang SG, Kim BK, Shim JG, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 32(5), 800, 2015
  4. Zaman M, Lee JH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 30(8), 1497, 2013
  5. Aroonwilas A, Chakma A, Tontiwachwuthikul P, Veawab A, Chem. Eng. Sci., 58(17), 4037, 2003
  6. Wehrli M, Hirschberg S, Schweizer R, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 81(1), 116, 2003
  7. Petrova T, Vaklieva-Bancheva N, Darakchiev S, Popov R, Clean Technol. Environ., 16, 1381, 2014
  8. Gorak A, Olujic Z, Distillation: Equipment and Processes, Academic Press, London (2014).
  9. Olujic Z, Ali AM, Jansens PJ, Chem. Eng. Process., 43, 465, 2004
  10. Billingham JF, Bonaquist DP, Lockett MJ, Ins. Chemical Engineers Symposium Series, 142, 841, 1997
  11. Dhotre MT, Joshi JB, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 81(3-4), 677, 2003
  12. Petrova T, Semkov K, Dodev C, Chem. Eng. Process., 42(11), 931, 2003
  13. Dhotre MT, Joshi JB, Chem. Eng. J., 125(3), 149, 2007
  14. Edwards DP, Krishnamurthy KR, Potthoff RW, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 77(7), 656, 1999
  15. Darakchiev R, Dodev C, Chem. Eng. Process., 41(5), 385, 2002
  16. Stemich C, Spiegel L, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 89(8A), 1392, 2011
  17. Mosca G, Schaeffer P, Griepsma B, Sulzer Technical Review, 3, 6, 2010
  18. Kim J, Pham DA, Lim YI, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 121, 99, 2017
  19. Ali AM, Jansens PJ, Olujic Z, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 81(1), 108, 2003
  20. Zarei T, Abedini E, Rahimi R, Khorshidi J, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 34(4), 969, 2017
  21. Chen S, Fan YP, Yan ZH, Wang W, Liu XH, Lu CX, Chem. Eng. Sci., 153, 58, 2016
  22. Ngo SI, Lim YI, Song BH, Lee UD, Lee JW, Song JH, Powder Technol., 275, 188, 2015
  23. Ngo SI, Lim YI, Hahn MH, Jung J, Bang YH, Comput. Chem. Eng., 103, 58, 2017
  24. Pham HH, Lim YI, Cho CH, Bang YH, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 128, 192, 2017
  25. Shih TH, Liou WW, Shabbir A, Yang Z, Zhu J, Comput. Fluids, 24, 227, 1995
  26. Kim MI, Lee Y, Kim BW, Lee DH, Song WS, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 26(2), 359, 2009
  27. Olujic Z, Chinese J. Chem. Eng., 19, 726, 2011