Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.34, No.10, 2591-2596, 2017
Hydrocracking of waste lubricant into gasoline fraction over CoMo catalyst supported on mesoporous carbon from bovine bone gelatin
The hydrocracking of waste lubricant into gasoline fraction was carried out using CoMo catalyst supported on mesoporous carbon. The carbon was synthesized using bovine bone gelatin and SBA-15 as a template. The metals were loaded onto the carbon by wet impregnation method. The total metal content of catalyst was prepared into two different amounts which were labelled as CoMo/MCG1 and CoMo/MCG2. Catalytic activity and selectivity were evaluated in hydrocracking of waste lubricant at 450, 475, and 500 °C, and lubricant/catalyst weight ratio of 50, 100, 200, 300, and 400. The result revealed that acidity and specific surface area of the catalyst played an important role in determining the catalytic performance in the hydrocracking of waste lubricant. The highest percentage of gasoline fraction was 58.09%, produced by hydrocracking of waste lubricant at 475 °C and lubricant/catalyst weight ratio of 300 using CoMo/MCG2 catalyst.
[References]
  1. Permsubscul A, Vitidsant T, Damronglerd S, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(1), 37, 2006
  2. Trisunaryanti W, Purwono S, Putranto A, Indo. J. Chem., 8(3), 342, 2008
  3. Trisunaryanti W, Syoufian A, Purwono S, J. Chem. Chem Eng., 7, 175, 2013
  4. Egorova M, Prins R, J. Catal., 225(2), 417, 2004
  5. Hussain M, Song SK, Lee JH, Ihm SK, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45(2), 536, 2006
  6. Boukoberine Y, Hamada B, Arabian J. Chem., 9(1), 522, 2016
  7. Soghrati E, Kazemeini M, Rashidi MA, Jozani JK, Procedia Eng., 42, 1484, 2012
  8. Sriningsih W, Saerodji MG, Trisunaryanti W, Armunanto R, Falah II, Procedia Environ. Sci., 20, 215, 2014
  9. Fan Y, Lu J, Shi G, Liu HY, Bao XJ, Catal. Today, 125(3-4), 220, 2007
  10. Hussain M, Ihm S, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 3, 698, 2009
  11. He X, Zhang Y, Zhu C, Huang H, Hu H, Liu Y, Kang Z, New. J. Chem. (2015), DOI:10.1039/C5NJ01430A.
  12. Yeom DH, Choi J, Byun WJ, Lee JK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 33(10), 3029, 2016
  13. Lu A, Li W, Schmidt W, Kiefer W, Ferdi S, Carbon, 42, 2939, 2004
  14. Sakintuna B, Yurum Y, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 93, 304, 2006
  15. Kamegawa K, Kodama M, Nishikubo K, Yamada H, Adachi Y, Yoshida H, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 87, 118, 2005
  16. Valle-Vigon P, Sevilla M, Fuertes AB, Appl. Surf. Sci., 261, 574, 2012
  17. Ulfa M, Trisunaryanti W, Falah II, Kartini I, Sutarno, JAC, 7(5), 1, 2014
  18. Lee J, Hwang S, Lee SB, Song IK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 27(6), 1755, 2010
  19. Jung JS, Kim TJ, Seo G, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 21(4), 777, 2004
  20. Ramos JM, Wang JA, Chen LF, Arellano U, Ramirez SP, Sotelo R, Schachat P, Catal. Commun., 72, 57, 2015
  21. Ahmadi S, Yuan ZS, Rohani S, Xu CB, Catal. Today, 269, 182, 2016
  22. Le MT, Do VH, Truong DD, Bruneel E, Van Driessche I, Riisager A, Fehrmann R, Trinh QT, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 55(17), 4846, 2016
  23. Maiyalagan T, Nassr AA, Alaje TO, Bron M, Scott K, J. Power Sources, 211, 147, 2012
  24. Sie ST, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 31, 1881, 2003
  25. Chandrasekar G, Son WJ, Ahn WS, J. Porous Mat., 16, 545, 2009
  26. Lee J, Choi Y, Shin J, Lee JK, Catal. Today (2015), DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2015.09.046.
  27. Ishihara A, Tanaka S, Aiba M, Hashimoto T, Nasu H, J. Jpn. Petrol. Inst, 58, 2, 2015
  28. Yang J, Dong Y, Li J, Liu Z, Min F, Li Y, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 32(11), 2247, 2015