Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.34, No.10, 2570-2583, 2017
Energy management in multi stage evaporator through a steady and dynamic state analysis
Increasing energy demand, high cost of energy and global warming issues across the globe require energyintensive industries, such as paper mills to improve energy efficiency. Multi-stage evaporators used to concentrate the black liquor in such mills form its most energy consuming unit and require a strong understanding of steady and unsteady state behavior to ensure energy savings. The modeling of nonlinear heptads’ effect system yielded a set of complex nonlinear algebraic and differential equations that are analyzed using Interior-point method and state space representation. Dynamic response of product concentration and system vapor temperatures along with system stability and controllability have been explored by disturbing the flow rate, concentration and temperature of feed, and fresh steam flow rate. Simulations predict that steam flow rate, feed flow rate and its concentration invariably are major controlling factors (in decreasing order) of vapor temperature and product concentration. The interactive behavior between different effects translates into slower responses of the effects with increasing separation from disturbance source. This steady state and transient study opens many new explanations to this relatively less explored area and helps to propose and implement industrial PID controllers to reduce steam consumption and control product quality.
[References]
  1. Johnson T, Johnson B, Mukherjee KHA, http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:4wppefVmJTkJ:becaamec.co.nz/media/~/media/beca_amec/media/technical_papers/india_emerging_giant_pulp_paper_industry.ashx+&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=in.
  2. Verma OP, Suryakant, G. Manik, Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manage., 1 (2016), DOI:10.1007/s13198-016-0533-0.
  3. Laurijssen J, Faaij A, Worrell E, Appl. Energy, 98, 102, 2012
  4. Jyoti G, Khanam S, Int. J. Therm. Sci., 76, 110, 2014
  5. Sarkar P, Datta S, Bhattacharjee C, Bhattacharya PK, Gupta BB, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 23(4), 617, 2006
  6. Naqvi M, Yan JY, Dahlquist E, Appl. Energy, 90(1), 24, 2012
  7. Marshman DJ, Chmelyk T, Sidhu MS, Gopaluni RB, Dumont GA, Appl. Energy, 87(11), 3514, 2010
  8. Kim JW, Lalvani SB, Akash BA, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 12(5), 582, 1995
  9. Esfahani IJ, Rashidi J, Ifaei P, Yoo CK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 33(2), 351, 2016
  10. Kumar D, Kumar V, Singh VP, Appl. Math. Model., 37, 384, 2013
  11. El-Dessouky HT, Ettouney HM, Desalination, 125(1-3), 259, 1999
  12. Huang YC, Hung CI, Chen CK, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part A J. Power Energy, 214, 61, 2000
  13. Sharma R, Mitra S, Int. J. Green Energy, 2, 109, 2005
  14. Bhargava R, Khanam S, Mohanty B, Ray AK, Comput. Chem. Eng., 32(10), 2203, 2008
  15. Ding XD, Cai WJ, Jia L, Wen CY, Appl. Energy, 86(1), 81, 2009
  16. Khanam S, Mohanty B, Desalination, 262(1-3), 64, 2010
  17. Wu SY, Jiang L, Xiao L, Li YR, Xu JL, Int. J. Green Energy, 9, 780, 2012
  18. Srivastava D, Mohanty B, Bhargava R, Chem. Eng. Commun., 200(8), 1089, 2013
  19. Xevgenos D, Michailidis P, Dimopoulos K, Krokida M, Loizidou M, Desalin Water Treat, 53, 3407, 2015
  20. Verma OP, Mohammed TH, Mangal S, Manik G, Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manage., 1 (2016).
  21. Oh J, Ye IS, Park S, Ryu C, Park SK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 31(12), 2136, 2014
  22. Kaya D, Sarac HI, Energy, 32(8), 1536, 2007
  23. Khanam S, Mohanty B, Appl. Energy, 87(4), 1102, 2010
  24. Karlsson M, Appl. Energy, 88(3), 577, 2011
  25. Lambert RN, Joye DD, Koko FW, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 26, 100, 1987
  26. Gautami G, Khanam S, Desalination, 288, 16, 2012
  27. Ayangbile WO, Okeke EO, Beveridge GSG, Pergamon, 8 (1984), DOI:10.1016/0098-1354(84)87011-8.
  28. Higa M, Freitas AJ, Bannwart AC, Zemp RJ, Appl. Therm. Eng., 29, 515, 2009
  29. Tuan CI, Yeh YL, Hsu LF, Chen TC, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 29(3), 341, 2012
  30. Winchester JA, Marsh C, Dyn. Control, 77 (1999), DOI:10. 1205/026387699526340.
  31. Andre H, Ritter RA, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 46, 259, 1968
  32. Shin H, Lim YK, Oh SK, Lee SG, Lee JM, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 34(2), 287, 2017
  33. Newelll RB, Fisher DG, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 11(2), 213, 1972
  34. Izawa Y, Hakomori K, Trans. Soc. Instrum Control Eng., 32, 197, 1996
  35. To LC, Tade MO, Le Page GP, Control Eng. Practice, 6, 1309, 1998
  36. Adams GJ, Burke BJ, Goodwin GC, The International Federationof Automatic Control, 41 (2008), DOI:10.3182/20080706-5- KR-1001.02356.
  37. Verma OP, Haji TM, Mangal S, Manik G, Int. J. Control, 9, 5287, 2016
  38. Yadav P, Jana AK, Chemical Product and Process Modeling Simulation and Control of a Commercial Double Effect Evaporator: Tomato Juice, 5 (2010), DOI:10.2202/1934-2659.1443.
  39. Stefanov Z, Hoo KA, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 44(9), 3146, 2005
  40. Russell NT, Bakker HHC, Chaplin RI, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 78(8), 1120, 2000
  41. Costa AOS, Lima EL, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 81, 1032, 2008
  42. Runyon CH, Rumsey TR, McCarthy KL, J. Food Eng., 14, 185, 1991
  43. Miranda V, Simpson R, J. Food Eng., 66(2), 203, 2005
  44. Verma OP, Mohammed TH, Mangal S, Manik G, In: Proc. Fifth Int. Conf. Soft Comput. Probl. Solving SocProS 2015, Vol. 2, Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2016, p. 1011- 42.
  45. Pourrajabian A, Ebrahimi R, Mirzaei M, Shams M, Appl. Math. Comput., 219, 11483, 2013
  46. Yan W, Liu F, Chung CY, Wong KP, IEEE Trans Power Syst., 21, 1163, 2006
  47. Mesfun S, Toffolo A, Appl. Energy, 107, 98, 2013
  48. Kuhn HW, Tuckerm A, Proc. Second Symp. Math. Stat. Probab., 481 (1951), DOI:10.1007/BF01582292.
  49. Verma OP, Mohammed TH, Mangal S, Manik G, Energy, 129, 148, 2017
  50. Albuquerque JS, Gopal V, Staus GH, Biegler LT, Erik Ydstie B, Comput. Chem. Eng., 21, S853, 1997
  51. Kojima M, Megiddo N, Mizuno S, Math Program, 61, 263, 1993
  52. Kusiak A, Xu GL, Zhang ZJ, Energy Conv. Manag., 85, 146, 2014
  53. Grossmann IE, Caballero JA, Yeomans H, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 16(4), 407, 1999
  54. Kang J, Cao YK, Word DP, Laird CD, Comput. Chem. Eng., 71, 563, 2014
  55. Khanam S, Mohanty B, Comput. Chem. Eng., 35(10), 1983, 2011
  56. Verma OP, Manik G, Jain VK, J. Comput. Sci., (2017), DOI:10.1016/j.jocs.2017.04.001.
  57. Verma OP, Mohammed TH, Mangal S, Manik G, Trans. Inst. Meas Control, 142331217700239 (2017), DOI:10.1177/0142331217700239.
  58. Verma OP, Kumar S, Manik G, Proc. Fourth Int. Conf. Soft Comput. Probl. Solving SocProS 2014, Vol. 2, New Delhi: Springer India, 103 (2015).