Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.34, No.9, 2519-2526, 2017
Polyethylenimine-coated polysulfone/bacterial biomass composite fiber as a biosorbent for the removal of anionic dyes: Optimization of manufacturing conditions using response surface methodology
This study aim was to optimize the manufacturing conditions polyethylenimine-coated polysulfone/bacterial biomass composite fiber (PEI-PSBF) to remove anionic pollutants from aqueous solution. The contents of biomass, PEI, and glutaraldehyde (GA) were selected as independent variables, and the response was defined as Reactive Yellow 2 (RY2) uptake. The manufacturing conditions were optimized by response surface methodology (RSM) with the full factorial central composite design (CCD). The determined coefficient of determination (R2) value of the reduced quadratic model was 0.9551, and the optimal manufacturing conditions were predicted as 4.145 g of biomass, 1.104 g of PEI and 3.9 μL of GA, at where the predicted RY2 uptake was 543.78mg/g. For validating the RSM-predicted results, the RY2 sorption capacity of the optimized PEI-PSBF was evaluated through isotherm experiments. The experimentally confirmed maximal uptake was comparable to predicted one. From these studies, the manufacturing conditions for PEI-PSBF were well optimized and its sorption capacity was 3.83 times higher thanthat of the PSBF.
[References]
  1. Bayramoglu G, Celik G, Arica MY, J. Hazard. Mater., 137(3), 1689, 2006
  2. Purkait MK, DasGupta S, De S, J. Environ. Manage., 76, 135, 2005
  3. Punzi M, Nilsson F, Anbalagan A, Svensson BM, Jonsson M, Mattiasson B, Jonstrup M, J. Hazard. Mater., 292, 52, 2015
  4. Aksu Z, Process Biochem., 40(3-4), 997, 2005
  5. Kyzas GZ, Fu J, Matis KA, Materials, 6, 5131, 2013
  6. Crini G, Bioresour. Technol., 97(9), 1061, 2006
  7. Gao JF, Zhang Q, Su K, Chen RN, Peng YZ, J. Hazard. Mater., 174(1-3), 215, 2010
  8. Wang J, Chen C, Biotechnol. Adv., 27, 195, 2009
  9. Michalak I, Chojnacka K, Witek-Krowiak A, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 170(6), 1389, 2013
  10. Vijayaraghavan K, Yun YS, Biotechnol. Adv., 26, 266, 2008
  11. Kim S, Won SW, Cho CW, Yun YS, Desalin. Water Treat., 57, 20084, 2015
  12. Won SW, Choi SB, Mao J, Yun YS, J. Hazard. Mater., 244, 245, 2013
  13. Kwak IS, Won SW, Choi SB, Mao J, Kim S, Chung BW, Yun YS, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 28(3), 927, 2011
  14. Kim S, Song MH, Wei W, Yun YS, J. Hazard. Mater., 283, 657, 2015
  15. Kao WC, Wu JY, Chang CC, Chang JS, J. Hazard. Mater., 169(1-3), 651, 2009
  16. Won SW, Kim S, Kotte P, Lim A, Yun YS, J. Hazard. Mater., 263, 391, 2013
  17. Cho Chul-Woong, Kang Su Bin, Kim Sok, Yun Yeoung-Sang, Won Sung Wook, Chem. Eng. J., 302, 545, 2016
  18. Kim S, Choi YE, Yun YS, J. Hazard. Mater., 313, 29, 2016
  19. Mao JA, Kwak IS, Sathishkumar M, Sneha K, Yun YS, Bioresour. Technol., 102(2), 1462, 2011
  20. Bezerra MA, Santelli RE, Oliveira EP, Villar LS, Escaleira LA, Talanta, 76, 965, 2008
  21. Kolaei M, Dashtian K, Rafiee Z, Ghaedi M, Ultrason. Sonochem., 33, 240, 2016
  22. Hassani A, Khataee A, Karaca S, Karaca M, Kiransan M, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 3, 2738, 2015
  23. Ozer A, Gurbuz G, Calimli A, Korbahti BK, Chem. Eng. J., 146(3), 377, 2009
  24. Kim S, Reddy DHK, Choi YE, Yun YS, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 66, 379, 2016
  25. Demadis KD, Paspalaki M, Theodorou J, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50(9), 5873, 2011
  26. Abbasi M, Habibi MM, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 62, 112, 2016
  27. Sohbatzadeh H, Keshtkar AR, Safdari J, Fatemi F, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 89, 647, 2016
  28. Singh KP, Singh AK, Gupta S, Sinha S, Desalination, 270(1-3), 275, 2011
  29. Chamoli S, Alexandria Eng. J., 54, 429, 2015
  30. Ding Y, Sartaj M, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 3, 807, 2015
  31. Soltani RDC, Rezaee A, Khataee AR, Safari M, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 20(4), 1861, 2014
  32. Won SW, Kwak IS, Yun YS, Bioresour. Technol., 160, 93, 2014
  33. Deng S, Ting YP, Water Res., 39, 2167, 2005
  34. Kratochvil D, Volesky B, Trends Biotechnol., 16, 291, 1998