Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.34, No.9, 2435-2444, 2017
Re-refining of used lubricant oil by solvent extraction using central composite design method
The primary aim of this study was to recover base oil from used oil using solvent extraction followed by the adsorption method. Many effective variables were examined within the solvent extraction method, including using different solvents, solvent/used oil, temperature and speed of blending. Central composite design (CCD) was applied as the statistical method. Response surface methodology was then used to find the optimum conditions in the process of extraction: ratio of solvent/used oil 2.4 and 3.12 vol/vol, temperature=54 and 18 °C, and speed of mixing=569 and 739 rpm for 1-butanol and methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), respectively. Various flocculation agents were used with the solvent, such as Sodium hydroxide (NaOH), Potassium hydroxide (KOH) and Monoethylamine (MEA); they provided an increase in the separation efficiency. The best result was obtained when using 2 grams of MEA/kg solvent; this amount of MEA increases sludge removal from 12.6% to 14.7%. In the process of clay adsorption, the variables that were tested included the ratio of clay/extract oil, temperature and time of contact. The best conditions in the process of adsorption by activated bentonite were a ratio of clay/extract oil=15 wt/vol%, temperature=120 °C, and time of contact=150 minutes. The recovered base oil was analyzed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and compared to Iraqi specifications of base oils. The recovered base oil specifications were analyzed, including, viscosity @100 °C 8.32, 9.22 cSt, pour point -17.35, -22.23 °C, flash point 210.12, 223.04 oC, total acid number (TAN) 0.25, nill, total base number (TBN) nill, nill, ash 0.031, 0.0019wt% and color 3.0, 2.5 for two types of base oil recovered using MEK, 1- butanol with activated bentonite, respectively.
[References]
  1. Mohammed RR, Ibrahim IAR, Taha AH, McKay G, Chem. Eng. J., 220, 343, 2013
  2. Yin H, Tan Q, Chen Y, Lv G, He D, Hou X, Microchem J., 97, 131, 2011
  3. Dos Reis MA, Jeronimo MS, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 27, 1222, 1988
  4. Kamal A, Naqvi D, Khan F, Pet. Sci. Technol., 27, 1810, 2009
  5. Wu C, Hamada M, Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Parameter Design Optimization, Wiley (2001).
  6. VeredaAlonso E, Torres AG, Cordero MS, Pavon JC, Microchem J., 97, 2011
  7. Omolara AM, Olurotimi AD, Olatunji GO, Int. J. Ene. Env. Res., 3, 1, 2015
  8. Durrani AH, Panhwar MI, Kazi R, Quarterly Mehran University Res. J. Eng. Technol., 31 (2012).
  9. Montgomery DC, Design and analysis of experiments, 4th Ed. Wiley, New York (1996).
  10. Ozer A, Gurbuz G, Calimli A, Korbahti BK, Chem. Eng. J., 146(3), 377, 2009
  11. Myers and Montgomery, Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, 2nd Ed. Wiley, New York (2002).
  12. Hussein M, Amer AA, Gaberah AS, Am. J. Environ. Eng. Sci., 144 (2014).
  13. Yang X, Chen L, Xiang S, Li L, Xia D, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 52, 12763, 2013
  14. Jamil SM, Ali MW, Ripin A, Ahmad A, J. Appl. Sci., 15, 516, 2015
  15. Kamal MA, Naqvi SMD, Khan F, Scientific World J., 2014, (2014).
  16. Komaki M, Malakooti B, International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Detroit, Michigan, USA (2016).
  17. Katiyar V, Husain S, Cur. World Environ., 5, 23, 2010
  18. Kamal A, Khan F, Oil Gas Sci. Technol., 64, 191, 2009
  19. Thomas WJ, Crittenden B, Adsorption technology & design, Reed Educational and Professional Publishing Ltd. (1998).
  20. Udonne JD, J. Petroleum Gas Eng., 2, 12, 2011
  21. Jodeh S, MSM, Obeid AAA, Warad I, Environ. Sci., 6, 580, 2015
  22. Al-Jobouri IS, Dhahir SA, Al-SaadeAl-Saade K. KA, Am. J. Environ. Sci., 9, 269, 2013
  23. Abdel-Jabbar NM, Al Zubaidy EAH, Mehrvar M, Int. J. Chem. Bio. Eng., 3, 70, 2010
  24. Salem S, Salem A, Babaei AA, Chem. Eng. J., 260, 368, 2015