Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.34, No.8, 2180-2187, 2017
Upgrading of pyrolysis bio-oil using WO3/ZrO2 and Amberlyst catalysts: Evaluation of acid number and viscosity
Tungstated zirconia (WO3/ZrO2 with WO3 loadings of 9.9 (WZ9.9), 15.5 (WZ15.5), and 15.7wt% (WZ15.7)) and Amberlyst (15, 35, 36, 39 and 45) catalysts were employed to upgrade pyrolysis bio-oil of acacia sawdust through an esterification reaction using methanol at atmospheric pressure and room temperature or 80°C. The upgrading efficiency was evaluated by measuring the total acid number (TAN) and viscosity. The viscosity and TAN of the resulting upgraded bio-oil were found to be dependent on the calcination temperature of the WO3/ZrO2 catalysts. At room temperature, the largest decrease in viscosity and TAN of the bio-oil and methanol mixture was obtained using WZ9.9 tungstated zirconia calcined at 900 °C. An increase in reaction temperature to 80 °C improved the flowability and TAN of the methanol-added bio-oil using WZ9.9 activated at 900 °C. The product distribution of the bio-oil upgraded using methanol revealed esterification to be the dominant reaction pathway under the reaction conditions of this study. When the ether extracted bio-oil was upgraded at 80 °C using methanol over catalysts, the Amberlyst catalysts were found more effective than tungstated zirconia catalysts in enhancing the esterification reaction and reducing TAN.
[References]
  1. Kim HB, Park JH, Int. J. Urban Sci., 18, 373, 2014
  2. Park D, Kim NS, Park H, Kim K, Int. J. Urban Sci., 16, 85, 2012
  3. Kim SS, Ly HV, Chun BH, Ko JH, Kim J, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 33(11), 3128, 2016
  4. Kim YM, Kim BS, Chea KS, Jo TS, Kim S, Park YK, Appl. Chem. Eng., 27(4), 407, 2016
  5. Lohitharn N, Shanks BH, Catal. Commun., 11, 96, 2009
  6. Li X, Gunawan R, Lievens C, Wang Y, Mourant D, Wang S, Wu HW, Garcia-Perez M, Li CZ, Fuel, 90(7), 2530, 2011
  7. Park SH, Cho HJ, Ryu C, Park YK, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 36, 314, 2016
  8. Wei Y, Lei HW, Wang L, Zhu L, Zhang XS, Liu YP, Chen SL, Ahring B, Energy Fuels, 28(2), 1207, 2014
  9. Lee H, Kim YM, Lee IG, Jeon JK, Jung SC, Chung JD, Choi WG, Park YK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 33(12), 3299, 2016
  10. Lee EH, Park RS, Kim H, Park SH, Jung SC, Jeon JK, Kim SC, Park YK, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 37, 18, 2016
  11. Yang Z, Kumar A, Huhnke RL, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 50, 859, 2015
  12. Choi JH, Kim SS, Suh DJ, Jang EJ, Min KI, Woo HC, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 33(9), 2691, 2016
  13. Park HC, Choi HS, Lee JE, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 33(4), 1159, 2016
  14. Mohan D, Pittman CU, Steele PH, Energy Fuels, 20(3), 848, 2006
  15. Huber GW, Iborra S, Corma A, Chem. Rev., 106(9), 4044, 2006
  16. Xiu S, Shahbazi A, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 16, 4406, 2012
  17. Zhang Z, Sui S, Wang F, Wang Q, Pittman CU, Energies, 6, 4531, 2013
  18. Jiang XX, Zhong ZP, Ellis N, Wang Q, Chem. Eng. Technol., 34(5), 727, 2011
  19. Chen D, Zhou J, Zhang Q, Zhu X, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 40, 69, 2014
  20. Wenting F, Ronghou L, Weiqi Z, Yuanfei M, Renzhan Y, Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 7, 83, 2014
  21. Ciddor L, Bennett JA, Hunns JA, Wilson K, Lee AF, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 90(5), 780, 2015
  22. Zhang XH, Zhang Q, Wang TJ, Li BS, Xu Y, Ma LL, Fuel, 179, 312, 2016
  23. Ilgen O, Fuel Process. Technol., 124, 134, 2014
  24. Weerachanchai P, Tangsathitkulchai C, Tangsathitkulchai M, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 29(2), 182, 2012
  25. Talukder MMR, Wu JC, Lau SK, Cui LC, Shimin G, Lim A, Energy Fuels, 23(1), 1, 2009