Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.34, No.5, 1524-1530, 2017
In situ mass spectrometry of glucose decomposition under hydrothermal reactions
We designed an in situ mass spectrometry (in situ MS) analysis method and developed to identify the products of glucose decomposition under hydrothermal condition for the first time. The in situ MS analysis was performed by coupling a tubular batch reactor with a quadrupole mass analyzer via custom-built connection fittings. The products of glucose decomposition were investigated by in situ MS, mass spectrometry of cold effluent, and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of cold effluent and the results were compared. At 140 °C, in situ MS and mass spectrometry of cold effluent showed that the decomposition of glucose does not proceed; this was confirmed by comparison with the mass spectral database for glucose. At 180 °C or higher, a clear base fragmentation peak of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) at position m/z 97 and that of furfural at m/z 96, formic acid (m/z=46) and levulinic acid (m/z=116) were observed by mass spectrometry. No levulinic acid or furfural was observed through conventional HPLC analysis under any condition; only glucose, formic acid, and 5-HMF could be detected. The effectiveness of in situ MS analysis is clear, compared to mass spectrometry analysis of cold effluent and HPLC analysis.
[References]
  1. Chen H, Zhou D, Luo G, Zhang S, Chen J, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 47, 427, 2015
  2. Song M, Duc Pham H, Seon J, Woo HC, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 50, 782, 2015
  3. Wei N, Quarterman J, Jin YS, Trends Biotechnol., 31, 70, 2013
  4. Knezevic D, van Swaaij WPM, Kersten SRA, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48(10), 4731, 2009
  5. Cao XF, Peng XW, Sun SN, Zhong LX, Chen W, Wang S, Sun RC, Carbohydr. Polym., 118, 44, 2015
  6. Joshi SS, Zodge AD, Pandare KV, Kulkarni BD, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 53(49), 18796, 2014
  7. Blazso M, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 74, 344, 2005
  8. Patwardhan PR, Satrio JA, Brown RC, Shanks BH, Bioresour. Technol., 101(12), 4646, 2010
  9. Alif MF, Matsumoto K, Kitagawa K, Microchem J., 99, 394, 2011
  10. Hurt MR, Degenstein JC, Gawecki P, Borton DJ, Vinueza NR, Yang L, Agrawal R, Delgass WN, Ribeiro FH, Kenttamaa HI, Anal. Chem., 85, 10927, 2013
  11. Kano H, Okamoto T, Kitagawa S, Iiguni Y, Ohtani H, Ito H, Iwai K, Kuno M, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 113, 165, 2015
  12. Piskorz J, Majerski P, Radlein D, Vladars-Usas A, Scott DS, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 56, 145, 2000
  13. Lin YC, Cho J, Tompsett GA, Westmoreland PR, Huber GW, J. Phys. Chem. C, 113, 20097, 2009
  14. Sharpe FR, Chappell CG, J. I. Brewing, 96, 381, 1990
  15. Yu Y, Shafie ZM, Wu HW, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 52(47), 17006, 2013
  16. Yu Y, Song B, Long Y, Wu HW, Energy Fuels, 30(10), 8787, 2016
  17. Yoshida T, Yanachi S, Matsumura Y, J. Jpn. Inst. Energy, 86, 700, 2007
  18. Matsumura Y, Yanachi S, Yoshida T, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45(6), 1875, 2006
  19. Promdej C, Matsumura Y, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50(14), 8492, 2011
  20. Kabyemela BM, Adschiri T, Malaluan RM, Arai K, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 38(8), 2888, 1999
  21. Kabyemela BM, Adschiri T, Malaluan RM, Arai K, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 36(5), 1552, 1997