Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.34, No.5, 1405-1415, 2017
Quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) for prediction of CO2 Henry’s law constant in some physical solvents with consideration of temperature effects
Different types of physical solvents have been utilized for CO2 removal from natural gas in the sweetening process. In this work, quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) method is suggested to build powerful models to predict Henry’s law constant (HLC) for CO2 in physical solvents. Modeling the HLC for CO2 as a function of molecular descriptors was achieved by multiple linear regression and descriptor selection was by genetic algorithm. The main proposed model has two simple descriptors, including the number of hydroxyl groups and molecular weight of solvents at fixed temperature. Also, the effect of temperature was studied, and this operational variable was added to the mentioned simple descriptors. In this case, the data set is comprised of 77 HLC for CO2 in solvents and at different temperatures. Several internal and external validation methods demonstrated the excellent ability for prediction, and the average relative deviation of main model was 6.48.
[References]
  1. Comite A, Costa A, Felice RD, Pagliai P, Vitiello D, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 32, 2, 2015
  2. Davea A, Dave M, Huanga Y, Rezvani S, Hewitt N, Int. J. Greenh Gas Con., 49, 436, 2016
  3. Gui X, Tang ZG, Fei WY, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 55(9), 3736, 2010
  4. DeVoe H, Thermodynamics and chemistry, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall (2014).
  5. Gui X, Tang ZG, Fei WY, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 56(5), 2420, 2011
  6. Henni A, Tontiwachwuthikul P, Chakma A, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 83(2), 358, 2005
  7. Gwinner B, Roizard D, Lapicque F, Favre E, Cadours R, Boucot P, Carrette PL, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45(14), 5044, 2006
  8. Jou FY, Otto FD, Mather AE, Fluid Phase Equilib., 175(1-2), 53, 2000
  9. Jou FY, Mather AE, Schmidt KAG, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 60(12), 3738, 2015
  10. Bohloul MR, Vatani A, Peyghambarzadeh SM, Fluid Phase Equilib., 365, 106, 2014
  11. Gui X, Tang Z, Fei W, LCE, 2, 26, 2011
  12. Miller MB, Chen DL, Luebke DR, Johnson JK, Enick RM, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 56(4), 1565, 2011
  13. Baj S, Krawczyk T, Darowska A, Siewniak A, Sobolewski A, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 32, 11, 2015
  14. Brockbank SA, Giles NF, Rowley RL, Wilding WV, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 59(4), 1052, 2014
  15. Majer V, Sedlbauer J, Bergin G, Fluid Phase Equilib., 272(1-2), 65, 2008
  16. Duchowicz PR, Garro JCM, Castro EA, Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst., 91, 133, 2008
  17. Golmohammadi H, Dashtbozorgi Z, Acree WE, Struct. Chem., 24, 1799, 2013
  18. Kim J, Jung DH, Rhee H, Choi SH, Sung MJ, Choi WS, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 25(4), 873, 2008
  19. Shacham M, Elly M, Paster I, Brauner N, Chem. Eng. Sci., 97, 186, 2013
  20. O’Loughlin DR, English NJ, Chemosphere, 127, 1, 2015
  21. Gharagheizi F, Ilani-Kashkouli P, Mirkhani SA, Farahani N, Mohammadi AH, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 51(12), 4764, 2012
  22. English NJ, Carroll DG, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Data, 41, 1150, 2001
  23. Xu J, Zhang H, Wang LX, Ye WX, Xu WL, Li ZC, Fluid Phase Equilib., 291(2), 111, 2010
  24. Sahoo S, Patel S, Mishra BK, Thermochim. Acta, 512(1-2), 273, 2011
  25. Goodarzi M, Ortiz EV, Coelho LS, Duchowicz PR, Atmos. Environ., 44, 3179, 2010
  26. Golzar K, Amjad-Iranagh S, Modarress H, Measurement, 46, 4206, 2013
  27. Shiffman D, The nature of code: Simulating Natural Systems with Processing, The nature of code, first Ed., U.S.A. (2012).
  28. Rajasekaran S, Vijayalakshmi Pai GA, Neural Networks, Fuzzy Logic and Genetic Algorithms: Synthesis and Applications (Computer), PHI Learning (2011).
  29. http://www.hyper.com
  30. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb, MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AP, Bloino J, Zheng G, Gaussian 98." Gaussian Inc., Pittsburgh PA, Gaussian Inc., Pittsburgh PA (1998).
  31. Talete SRL, Dragon for Windows (Software for Molecular Descriptor Calculation), Version 6 (2013).
  32. Sivanandam SN, Deepa SN, Introduction to Genetic Algorithms, Springer Science & Business Media (2007).
  33. IJolliffe IT, Principal Component Analysis, Springer, New York (2002).
  34. Golbraikh A, Tropsha A, J. Mol. Graph. Model, 20, 269, 2002
  35. XLSTAT software, XLSTAT-CCR module, Trial Version (2013).
  36. Gramatica P, QSAR Comb. Sci., 26, 694, 2007
  37. Minovski N, Zuperl S, Drgan V, Novi M, Anal. Chim. Acta, 759, 28, 2013
  38. Galvao AC, Francesconi AZ, J. Supercrit. Fluids, 51(2), 123, 2009
  39. Xu Y, Schutte RP, Hepler LG, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 70, 569, 1992
  40. Rucker CH, Rucker G, Meringer M, J. Chem. Inf. Model, 47, 2345, 2007
  41. Singh P, Niederer JPM, Versteeg GF, Int. J. Greenh Gas Control, 1, 5, 2007
  42. Singh P, Niederer JPM, Versteeg GF, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 87(2A), 135, 2009
  43. Kanegsberg B, Kanegsberg E, Handbook for Critical Cleaning: Cleaning Agents and Systems, 2nd Ed., CRC Press (2011).
  44. Osmialowski K, Piekos R, J. Solution. Chem., 20, 241, 1991
  45. Makitra RG, Pristanski RE, Flyunt RI, Russ. J. Gen. Chem., 73, 1227, 2003