Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.34, No.5, 1337-1345, 2017
Effect of Cu promoter and alumina phases on Pt/Al2O3 for propane dehydrogenation
We investigated the effects of different Cu weight ratio on θ or γ-Al2O3 which were impregnated with platinum in terms of catalytic activity for propane dehydrogenation and physicochemical properties. 1.5 wt% Pt, 0-10 wt% Cu catalyst supported on θ-Al2O3 or γ-Al2O3 was prepared by incipient wetness co-impregnation. Enhanced Pt dispersion by increasing Cu contents in γ-Al2O3 supported catalyst was confirmed via XRD and XPS. Pt and CuO was separated in Pt-Cu/θ-Al2O3, but Pt-Cu alloy was identified after reduction treatment. Also, adding Cu in Pt/Al2O3 makes catalyst’s acidity lower and this property led to increased propylene yield in propane dehydrogenation. However, Pt3Cu was not good for yield of PDH, which was confirmed in Pt-10Cu/θ-Al2O3 through XRD.
[References]
  1. Kim GH, Jung KD, Kim WI, Um BH, Shin CH, Oh K, Koh HL, Res. Chem. Intermed., 42, 351, 2016
  2. Zangeneh FT, Mehrazma S, Sahebdelfar S, Fuel Process. Technol., 109, 118, 2013
  3. Sahebdelfar S, Ravanchi MT, Zangeneh FT, Mehrazma S, Rajabi S, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 90(8), 1090, 2012
  4. Zangeneh FT, Sahebdelfar S, Bahmani M, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 21(7), 730, 2013
  5. Sahebdelfar S, Zangeneh FT, Iran. J. Chem. Eng., 7, 51, 2010
  6. Komasi M, Fatemi S, Razavian M, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 32, 7, 2015
  7. Akporiaye D, Jensen SF, Olsbye U, Rohr F, Rytter E, Ronnekleiv M, Spjelkavik AI, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40(22), 4741, 2001
  8. Vu BK, Song MB, Ahn IY, Suh YW, Suh DJ, Kim JS, Shin EW, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 17(1), 71, 2011
  9. Han Z, Li S, Jiang F, Wang T, Ma X, Gong J, Nanoscale, 6, 10000, 2014
  10. Mehdi V, Ali H, Asian J. Chem., 22, 9, 2010
  11. Zangeneh FT, Sahebdelfar S, Iran. J. Chem. Eng., 8, 49, 2011
  12. Yokoyama C, Bharadwaj SS, Schmidt LD, Catal. Lett., 38(3-4), 181, 1996
  13. Abd Hamid SB, Lambert D, Derouane EG, Catal Today, 63, 237, 2000
  14. Rioux R, Vannice M, J. Catal., 233, 147, 2015
  15. Gao JJ, Zhou GP, Qiu HJ, Wang Y, Wang J, Corrosion Sci., 108, 194, 2016
  16. Tymoczko J, Calle-Vallejo F, Colic V, Schuhmann W, Bandarenka AS, Electrochim. Acta, 179, 469, 2015
  17. Ensafi AA, Abarghoui MM, Rezaei B, Electrochim. Acta, 190, 199, 2016
  18. Epron F, Gauthard F, Barbier J, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 237(1-2), 253, 2002
  19. Veldurthi S, Shin CH, Joo OS, Jung KD, Catal. Today, 185(1), 88, 2012
  20. Mauldin CH, Baird WC, US Patent, 4,231,898 (1980).
  21. Gholidoust A, Naderifar A, Rahmani M, Sahebdelfar S, Int. J. Mod. Phys.: Conference Series, World Scientific, 168 (2012).
  22. Casiraghi C, Ferrari A, Robertson J, Phys. Rev. B, 72, 085401, 2005
  23. Shan YL, Sui ZJ, Zhu Y, Chen D, Zhou XG, Chem. Eng. J., 278, 240, 2015
  24. Nagaraja BM, Jung H, Yang DR, Jung KD, Catal. Today, 232, 40, 2014
  25. Vu BK, Song MB, Ahn IY, Suh YW, Suh DJ, Kim WI, Koh HL, Choi YG, Shin EW, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 400(1-2), 25, 2011