Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.34, No.2, 566-573, 2017
Bubble characteristics by pressure fluctuation analysis in gas-solid bubbling fluidized beds with or without internal
Bubble flow characteristics were investigated in gas-solid bubbling fluidized beds (0.3 m-I.D×2.4m-high) with or without internals by power spectral analysis of absolute pressure fluctuation. Metallurgical grade silicon particles (MG-Si) were used as bed materials. The particle density and mean particle diameter were 2,328 kg/m3 and 154 μm, respectively. Absolute pressure fluctuations were measured simultaneously at two different positions: plenum chamber and beds. Absolute pressure fluctuation in the beds was measured according to the axial bed height in the range of 0.1 to 0.8m. The total sampling time of each data set was 60 s, and the sampling rate was 200Hz. Absolute pressure fluctuation data were converted to a power spectral density (PSD) by a Fast-Fourier transform (FTT) algorithm. The PSD in the beds was separated into coherent and incoherent output power. The bubble size was estimated from the standard deviation of the spectrum of incoherent output power, which occurred due to the bubble flow. The estimated bubble size determined by incoherence component analysis was compared to various empirical correlations to determine the bubble size without internals. The estimated bubble size agreed well with the correlation by Choi et al. [19]. The internals were installed 0.45 m above the distributor. With the installation of the internals, and at the bed height of 0.5m, the bubble diameter was decreased by 77% compared to the bubble without the internal at U0=0.15m/s.
[References]
  1. Dutta S, Suciu GD, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 25, 345, 1992
  2. Liu MX, Zhang YM, Bi HT, Grace JR, Zhu YD, Chem. Eng. Sci., 65(11), 3485, 2010
  3. van der Schaaf J, Schouten JC, Johnsson F, van den Bleek CM, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 28(5), 865, 2002
  4. Chilekar VP, Warnier MJF, van der Schaaf J, Kuster BFM, Schouten JC, van Ommen JR, AIChE J., 51(7), 1924, 2005
  5. Chen H, Yang D, Cheng J, Procedia Eng., 102, 799, 2015
  6. Kang WK, Sutherland JP, Osberg GL, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 6, 499, 1967
  7. Bi HTT, Chem. Eng. Sci., 62(13), 3473, 2007
  8. Verloop J, Heertjes PM, Chem. Eng. Sci., 29, 1035, 1974
  9. Trnka O, Vesely V, Hartman M, Beran Z, AIChE J., 46(3), 509, 2000
  10. Sun JG, Chen MM, Chao BT, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 20(2), 315, 1994
  11. Li J, Kuipers JAM, Chem. Eng. Sci., 58(3-6), 711, 2003
  12. Davidson JF, Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 39, 230, 1961
  13. Kehoe PWK, Davidson JF, AIChE Symp. Ser., 69, 34, 1973
  14. Baeyens J, Geldart D, Chem. Eng. Sci., 29, 255, 1974
  15. Stewart PSB, Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 46, 60, 1968
  16. Lim JH, Lee Y, Shin JH, Bae K, Han JH, Lee DH, Powder Technol., 266, 312, 2014
  17. Lim JH, Shin JH, Bae K, Kim JH, Lee DH, Han JH, Lee DH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 32(9), 1938, 2015
  18. van der Schaaf J, Schouten JC, van den Bleek CM, Powder Technol., 95(3), 220, 1998
  19. Choi JH, Son JE, Kim SD, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 37(6), 2559, 1998
  20. Rowe PN, Chem. Eng. Sci., 31, 285, 1976
  21. Darton RC, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 55, 274, 1977
  22. Horio M, Nonaka A, AIChE J., 33, 1865, 1987
  23. Cai P, Schiavetti M, Demichele G, Grazzini GC, Miccio M, Powder Technol., 80(2), 99, 1994