Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.33, No.11, 3121-3127, 2016
Effect of gas diffusion layer compression on the polarization curves of a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell: Analysis using a polarization curve-fitting model
The effect of gas diffusion layer (GDL) compression on the polarization curves of a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell was analyzed using a polarization curve-fitting model. The polarization curves measured at four different GDL compression ratios were fitted with the model and were decomposed into an open circuit voltage and three over-voltages resulting from activation, ohmic, and mass-transport losses, respectively. The model fitting was excellent enough to use the model in the subsequent analysis of the GDL compression effect. The relationship between the over-voltages and the compression ratio was investigated by analyzing the estimated model parameters, and an optimal compression ratio was determined for the fuel cell. The proposed analysis method based on the polarization curve-fitting model can be applied to identifying quantitative differences of polarization curves under various operating conditions and designs for fuel cells.
[References]
  1. Larminie J, Dicks A, Fuel cell systems explained, 2nd Ed., Wiley, West Sussex, England (2003).
  2. Barbir F, PEM fuel cells: Theory and practice, 2nd Ed., Elsevier, Burlington, USA (2013).
  3. Wang Y, Chen KS, Mishler J, Cho SC, Adroher XC, Appl. Energy, 88(4), 981, 2011
  4. Han IS, Shin HK, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 53(2), 236, 2015
  5. Mendez A, Leo TJ, Herreros MA, Energies, 7, 4676, 2014
  6. Park S, Popov BN, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 31(8), 1384, 2014
  7. Han IS, Kho BK, Cho S, J. Power Sources, 304, 244, 2016
  8. Choi CH, Yu S, Han IS, Kho BK, Kang DG, Lee HY, Seo MS, Kong JW, Kim G, Ahn JW, Park SK, Jang DW, Lee JH, Kim M, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 41(5), 3591, 2016
  9. Lee WK, Ho CH, Van Zee JW, Murthy M, J. Power Sources, 84(1), 45, 1999
  10. Ge JB, Higier A, Liu HT, J. Power Sources, 159(2), 922, 2006
  11. Lin JH, Chen WH, Su YJ, Ko TH, Fuel, 87(12), 2420, 2008
  12. Zhou YB, Jiao K, Du Q, Yin Y, Li XG, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 38(29), 12891, 2013
  13. Nitta I, Himanen O, Mikkola M, Electrochem. Commun., 10, 47, 2008
  14. Ismail MS, Ingham DB, Ma L, Pourkashanian M, Renew. Energy, 52, 40, 2013
  15. Ye DH, Gauthier E, Benziger JB, Pan M, J. Power Sources, 256, 449, 2014
  16. Bazylak A, Sinton D, Liu ZS, Djilali N, J. Power Sources, 163(2), 784, 2007
  17. Ye DHH, Gauthier E, Cheah MJ, Benziger J, Pan M, AIChE J., 61(1), 355, 2015
  18. Yuan XZ, Wang HJ, Sun JC, Zhang JJ, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 32(17), 4365, 2007
  19. Haji S, Renew. Energy, 36(2), 451, 2011
  20. Moreira MV, da Silva GE, Renew. Energy, 34(7), 1734, 2009
  21. Kim J, Lee SM, Srinivasan S, Chamberlin CE, J. Electrochem. Soc., 142(8), 2670, 1995
  22. Saadi A, Becherif M, Aboubou A, Ayad MY, Renew. Energy, 56, 67, 2013
  23. Laurencelle F, Chahine R, Hamelin J, Agbossou K, Fournier M, Bose TK, Laperriere A, Fuel Cells, 1, 66, 2001
  24. MATLAB optimization toolbox user’s guide, http://it.mathworks.com/help/pdf_doc/optim/optim_tb.pdf.
  25. Inaba M, Kinumoto T, Kiriake M, Umebayashi R, Tasaka A, Ogumi Z, Electrochim. Acta, 51(26), 5746, 2006
  26. Yuan XZ, Zhang SS, Wang HJ, Wu JF, Sun JC, Hiesgen R, Friedrich KA, Schulze M, Haug A, J. Power Sources, 195(22), 7594, 2010