Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.33, No.3, 1014-1027, 2016
Prediction of power consumption and performance in ultrafiltration of simulated latex effluent using non-uniform pore sized membranes
Tha aim of the present study was to develop a series of numerical models for an accurate prediction of the power consumption in ultrafiltration of simulated latex effluent. The developed power consumption model incorporated fouling attachment, as well as chemical and physical factors in membrane fouling, in order to ensure accurate prediction and scale-up. This model was applied to heterogeneous membranes with non-uniform pore sizes at a given operating conditions and mem- brane surface charges. Polysulfone flat membrane, with a membrane molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) of 60,000 dalton, at different surface charges was used under a constant flow rate and cross-flow mode. In addition, the developed models were examined using various membranes at a variety of surface charges so as to test the overall reliability and accuracy of these models. The power consumption predicted by the models corresponded to the calculated values from the experimental data for various hydrophilic and hydrophobic membranes with an error margin of 6.0% up to 19.1%.
[References]
  1. Kennedy M, Kamanyi J, Rodriguez S, Lee N, Schippers J, Amy G, Adv. Membr. Technol. Appl., 131, 2008
  2. Javacek MH, Bouchet F, J. Membr. Sci., 82, 285, 1993
  3. Thiruvenkatachari R, Shim WG, Lee JW, Moon H, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 22(2), 250, 2005
  4. Kosvintsev S, Cumming IW, Holdich RG, Lloyd D, Starov VM, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 230, 167, 2004
  5. lozier J, Jacangelo A, Where we are head ? - the future of membrane treatement, in Proceedings of Water Quality Tech- nology Conference, November 10-14, 2002, Seattle, WA.
  6. Al-Amoudi A, Lovitt RW, J. Membr. Sci., 303, 4, 2007
  7. Hu A, Stuckey D, J. Environ. Eng., 132(2), 190, 2006
  8. Winzeler HB, Belfort G, J. Membr. Sci., 80, 35, 1993
  9. Avlonitis SA, Kouroumbas K, Vlachakis N, Desalination, 157(1-3), 151, 2003
  10. Bahnasawy AH, Shenana ME, Aust. J. Agric. Eng., 15, 54, 2010
  11. Suman D, Projjwal S, Chiranjib B, Siddhartha D, J. Environ. Pollut., 49(3-4), 197, 2012
  12. JURADO J, BELLHOUSE BJ, Filtr. Sep., 31(3), 273, 1994
  13. Knops F, Futselaar H, J. Membr. Sci., 73, 153, 1992
  14. Abdelrasoul A, Doan H, Lohi A, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 92(7), 1293, 2014
  15. Abdelrasoul A, Doan H, Lohi A, Cheng CH, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 53(23), 9897, 2014
  16. Abdelrasoul A, Doan H, Lohi A, Cheng CH, Sep. Purif. Technol., 135, 199, 2014
  17. Abdelrasoul A, Doan H, Lohi A, J. Membr. Sep. Technol., 2, 134, 2013
  18. Abdelrasoul A, Doan H, Lohi A, Fouling in Membrane Filtration and Remediation Methods, Mass Transfer - Advances in Sustainable Energy and Environment Oriented Numerical Modeling, Dr. Hironori Nakajima (Ed.), Intech Open Access Publisher, 195 (2013).
  19. Abdelrasoul A, Doan H, Lohi A, J. Membr. Sci., 433, 88, 2013
  20. Abdelrasoul A, Doan H, Lohi A, Cheng CH, Can. J. Chem. Eng., DOI:10.1002/cjce.22056., 2014
  21. Montgomery DC, Design and Analysis of Experiment, 5th Ed., Wiley, Inc., New York, USA (1997).