Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.33, No.3, 914-921, 2016
Immobilization technologies for the management of hazardous industrial waste using granite waste (case study)
Full characterization of granite waste sludge (GWS) was accomplished by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Xray fluorescence (XRF) for identification of its phase and chemical composition. Different leaching tests were conducted to determine the efficiency of the GWS for metal stabilization in hazardous sludge. The leaching of the metals from stabilized contaminated sludge was decreased as the GWS amount increased. Only 15% of GWS was sufficient for stabilization of all metal ions under investigation. The main reason for metal immobilization was attributed to the aluminosilicates or silicates matrix within the GWS, which can transform the metals in the form of their insoluble hydroxides or absorbed in the stabilized matrix. Also, solidification/stabilization technique was used for remediation of contaminated sludge. Compressive strength test after curing for 28 days was used for measuring the effectiveness of remediation technique; it was found to be 1.88MPa. This indicated that the remediated sludge was well solidified and safe to be used as a raw substance for roadway blocks. Therefore, this huge amount of by-product sludge derived from the granite cutting industry, which has a negative environmental impact due to its disposal, can be utilized as a binder material for solidification/stabilization of hazardous sludge.
[References]
  1. Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA, 2010), Country report on the solid waste management. http://www.sweep-net.org/ckfinder/userfiles/files/country-profiles/rapport-Egypte-en.pdf.
  2. Qian GG, Cao YL, Chui P, Tay J, J. Hazard. Mater., 129(1-3), 274, 2006
  3. Alejandro S, Jacint N, Chemosphere, 68, 703, 2007
  4. Bilgili MS, Demir A, Ince M, Ozkaya B, J. Hazard. Mater., 145, 186, 2006
  5. Knecht MA, Overview of U.S. Federal Laws and Regulations Affecting Mixed Waste Treatment. In : Hazardous and Radioactive Waste Treatment Technologies Handbook, CRP Press, ISBN 978-08493-9586-4 (2001).
  6. Buj I, Torras J, Rovira M, de Pablo J, J. Hazard. Mater., 175(1-3), 789, 2010
  7. Ashmawy AM, Ibrahim HS, Abdel Moniem SM, Saleh TS, Toxicol. Environ. Chem., 94(9), 1657, 2012
  8. Tomasevic D, Dalmacija MB, Prica MDJ, Dalmacija BD, Kerkez DV, Becelic-Tomin MR, Roncevic SD, Chemosphere, 92(11), 1490, 2013
  9. Lasheen MR, Ashmawy AM, Ibrahim HS, Abdel Moniem SM, Des. Water Treat., 51, 2644, 2013
  10. Garrido F, Illera V, Garcı MT, lez aG, Appl. Geochem., 20(2), 397, 2005
  11. Torres P, Fernandes HR, Agathopoulos S, Tulyaganov DU, Ferreira JMF, J. European Ceram. Soc., 24, 3177, 2004
  12. Menezes RR, Ferreira HS, Neves GA, de L. Lira H, Ferreira HC, J. European Ceram. Soc., 25(7), 1149, 2005
  13. Torres P, Fernandes HR, Olhero S, Ferreira JMF, J. European Ceram. Soc., 29(1), 23, 2009
  14. Marmol I, Ballester P, Cerro S, Monros G, Morales J, Sanchez L, Cem. Concr. Compos., 32(8), 617, 2010
  15. Monteiro SN, Pecanha LA, Vieira CMF, J. European Ceram. Soc., 24, 2349, 2004
  16. American Public Health Association, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd Ed. Washington D.C. (2012)
  17. McLaren RG, Clucas LM, J. Environ. Qual., 30, 1968, 2001
  18. Kandpal G, Ram B, Srivastava PC, Singh SK, J. Hazard. Mater., 106(2-3), 133, 2004
  19. American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM, 1991). Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Part II, Philadelphia: ASTM.
  20. European Committee for Standardization, (ENV 12176, 2000). Characterization of sludge - Determination of pH-value. Brussels, Belgium. http://www.ecn.nl/docs/society/horizontal/hor15_ph.pdf.
  21. European Council Decision 2003/33/EC. Establishing criteria and procedures for the acceptance of waste at landfills pursuant to Article 16 of and Annex II to Directive 1999/31/EC. Journal of the European Communities.
  22. U.S. EPA, Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP), Federal Register, 40 CFR 50, No. 286, 406 (1986).