Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.33, No.3, 862-872, 2016
Evaluation of the susceptibility of coal to spontaneous combustion by a TG profile subtraction method
It is imperative to have an in-depth understanding of the intrinsic reaction between coal and oxygen during low-temperature oxidation, as the reaction is the main source responsible for the self-heating and spontaneous combustion of coal. As low-temperature oxidation of coal involves a series of physical and chemical process and many parallel reactions, it is difficult to directly investigate the intrinsic reaction between coal and oxygen by conventional analytical method. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was used to investigate the intrinsic reaction between coal and oxygen based on the mass change. By means of the subtraction analysis method of TGA, the TG-subtraction curves were obtained by subtracting the TG-N2 curves from the TG-air curves. The results indicate that a TG-subtraction curve can better reflect the intrinsic reaction of coal oxidation than a TG-air curve by eliminating the influence of evaporation of water and thermal decomposition of inherent oxygen-containing groups. In terms of the rate of mass increase, the intrinsic reactions can be divided into three stages: slow oxidation stage, advanced oxidation stage and rapid oxidation stage. The activation energy at each of the stages, obtained by Coats and Redfern’s model, can be used to as a technical parameter to evaluate the proneness of coal spontaneous combustion. The optimum experiment conditions were also developed to study low-temperature coal oxidation with the subtraction method of TGA.
[References]
  1. Xue S, Wang J, Xie J, Wu J, Int. J. Coal Geol., 83(1), 82, 2010
  2. Song ZY, Kuenzer C, Int. J. Coal Geol., 133, 72, 2014
  3. Mastalerz M, Solano-Acosta W, Schimmelmann A, Drobniak A, Int. J. Coal Geol., 79(4), 167, 2009
  4. Carras JN, Day SJ, Saghafi A, Williams DJ, Int. J. Coal Geol., 78(2), 161, 2009
  5. Jo EM, Chun DH, Park IS, Kim SD, Rhim YJ, Choi H, Yoo J, Lim JH, Lee S, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 31(6), 981, 2014
  6. Wang HH, Dlugogorski BZ, Kennedy EM, Energy Fuels, 17(1), 150, 2003
  7. Yuan LM, Smith AC, Int. J. Coal Geol., 88(1), 24, 2011
  8. Zhang Y, Wang J, Wu J, Xue S, Li Z, Chang L, Int. J. Coal Geol., 1, 140, 2015
  9. Jo W, Choi H, Kim S, Yoo J, Chun D, Rhim Y, Lim J, Lee S, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 32(2), 255, 2015
  10. Dou G, Xin H, Wang D, Qin B, Zhong X, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 31(5), 801, 2014
  11. Beamish BB, Hamilton GR, Int. J. Coal Geol., 64(1-2), 133, 2005
  12. Jo W, Choi H, Kim S, Yoo J, Chun D, Rhim Y, Lim J, Lee S, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 30(5), 1034, 2013
  13. Choi H, Jo W, Kim S, Yoo J, Chun D, Rhim Y, Lim J, Lee S, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 31(12), 2151, 2014
  14. Slovak V, Taraba B, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 363, 110, 2012
  15. Avila C, Wu T, Lester E, Energy Fuels, 28(3), 1765, 2014
  16. Zhang Y, Wu J, Chang L, Wang J, Xue S, Li Z, Int. J. Coal Geol., 120, 41, 2014
  17. Mohalik NK, Panigrahi DC, Singh VK, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 98, 507, 2009
  18. Slovak V, Taraba B, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 101, 641, 2010
  19. Sima-Ella E, Yuan G, Mays T, Fuel, 84(14-15), 1920, 2005
  20. TeVrucht MLE, Griffiths PR, Energy Fuels, 3, 522, 1989
  21. Wang HH, Dlugogorski BZ, Kennedy EM, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 29(6), 487, 2003