Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.32, No.11, 2169-2180, 2015
Catalytic propane dehydrogenation: Advanced strategies for the analysis and design of moving bed reactors
A moving bed reactor (MBR) is one of the most innovative reactors that are commonly used in industry nowadays. However, the modeling and optimization of the reactor have been rarely performed at conceptual design stage due to its complexity of design, and it has resulted in increased capital and operating costs of the overall chemical processes. In this work, advanced strategies were introduced to model an MBR and its regenerator mathematically, incorporating catalyst deactivation, such as coke formation. Various reactor designs and operating parameters of the MBR were optimized to increase the overall reactor performance, such as conversion or selectivity of the main products across the reactor operating period. These optimization parameters include: (1) reactant flow inside a reactor, (2) various networks of MBRs, (3) temperature of the feed stream, (4) intermediate heating or cooling duties, (5) residence time of the catalyst or velocity of catalyst flow, and (6) flow rate of the fresh make-up catalyst. The propane dehydrogenation process was used as a case study, and the results showed the possibility of significant increase of reactor performance through optimization of the above parameters. For optimization, the simulated annealing (SA) algorithm was incorporated into the reactor modeling. This approach can be easily applied to other reaction processes in industry.
[References]
  1. Schaefer RJ, Vortmeyer D, Watson CC, Chem. Eng. Sci., 29(1), 119, 1974
  2. Marb CM, Vortmeyer D, Chem. Eng. Sci., 43(4), 811, 1988
  3. Haynes TN, Caram HS, Chem. Eng. Sci., 49(24), 5465, 1994
  4. Wolff EHP, Chem. Eng. Sci., 49(24), 5427, 1994
  5. Fricke J, Schmidt-Traub H, Chem. Eng. Process., 42(3), 237, 2003
  6. Mu ZZ, Wang JF, Wang TF, Jin Y, Chem. Eng. Process., 42(5), 409, 2003
  7. Sahebdelfar S, Bijani PM, Saeedizad M, Zangeneh FT, Ganji K, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 395(1-2), 107, 2011
  8. Szwast Z, Sieniutycz S, Chem. Eng. J., 103(1-3), 45, 2004
  9. Fogler HS, Gurmen MN, http://www.engin.umich.edu/cre/course/lectures/ten/index.htm.
  10. Larsson M, Coke on supported palladium and platinum catalysts, PhD Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology (1997).
  11. Jiang B, Feng X, Yan L, Jiang Y, Liao Z, Wang J, Yang Y, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 53, 4623, 2004
  12. Lee DK, Baek IH, Yoon WL, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 31(5), 649, 2006
  13. Cho YS, Joseph B, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 20, 314, 1981
  14. Aylon E, Fernandez-Colino A, Navarro MV, Murillo R, Garcia T, Mastral AM, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 47(12), 4029, 2008
  15. Kawase M, Suzuki TB, Inoue K, Yoshimoto K, Hashimoto K, Chem. Eng. Sci., 51(11), 2971, 1996
  16. Xu J, Liu YM, Xu GQ, Yu WF, Ray AK, AIChE J., 59(12), 4705, 2013
  17. Graca NS, Pais LS, Silva VMTM, Rodrigues AE, Chem. Eng. J., 207-208, 504, 2012
  18. Kurup AS, Subramani HJ, Hidajat K, Ray AK, Chem. Eng. J., 108(1-2), 19, 2005
  19. Yu WF, Hidajat K, Ray AK, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 42(26), 6743, 2003
  20. Gascon J, Tellez C, Herguido J, Menendez M, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 248(1-2), 105, 2003
  21. Sadana A, Doraiswamy LK, J. Catal., 23(2), 147, 1971
  22. Rzesnitzek T, Mullerschon H, Gunther FC, Wozniak M, Infotag “Nichtlineare Optimierung und stochastische Analysen mit LSOPT,” Stuttgart.
  23. Hwang S, Smith R, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 29(1), 25, 2012
  24. Dozier AR, Cross-flow reactor, US Patent, 4,108,106 (1978).
  25. Lee JM, Cross-flow, fixed-bed catalytic reactor, US Patent, 5,520,891(1994).
  26. Snyder JD, Subramaniam B, Chem. Eng. Sci., 53(4), 727, 1998
  27. Hunter MG, Goebel KW, Two-stage hydroprocessing reaction scheme with series recycle gas flow, US Patent, 5,958,218 (1999).
  28. Delbridge HT, Dyson DC, AIChE J., 19(5), 952, 1973