Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.32, No.5, 826-836, 2015
Measurement of liquid film thickness in air - water two phase flows in conventional and mini channels using image processing
The measurement and study of liquid films in the case of two phase flows is significant in many heat transfer and mass transfer applications, such as chemical process industries, micro reactors, coating processes and in boilers. The focus of the present study was to measure and characterize the thickness of the liquid films for various two phase flow regimes in conventional and in mini channels using a non-intrusive technique. Experiments were performed on tubes of diameters 0.6, 1.5, 2.6 and 3.4mm. The superficial velocities of gas and liquid are in the range of 0.01-50 and 0.01-3m/s, respectively. The flow patterns were recorded with a high speed camera. A method to determine the two phase flow velocity using image registration has been discussed. Morphological processing and gray scale analysis were used to determine the liquid film thickness and characterize the flow regimes. The flow patterns identified are bubbly, dispersed bubbly, slug, slug-annular, wavy-annular, stratified, and annular. The flow regimes were validated with flow maps available in the literature. The liquid film thickness was identified by distance transform technique in image processing. The magnitude of film thickness varied with liquid and gas flow velocities. The film thickness was represented in terms of capillary number. The variation in film thickness along the length of the flow regime has been discussed. A relation between the liquid film thicknesses measured using the non-intrusive image processing technique and capillary number for the conventional and mini tubes is proposed based on the analysis. h - = 2.03Ca0.13We0.52 for Bo>1 d h - = 1.08Ca0.4We0.35 for Bo<1 d It is concluded from the proposed correlation that the variation in liquid film thickness is different for conventional and mini channels because of the effect of inertial dominance in conventional channels and viscous dominance in mini channels.
[References]
  1. Howard JA, Walsh PA, Walsh EJ, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 54(21-22), 4752, 2011
  2. Damianides CA, Westwater JW, in Proc. Second UK National Conf. on Heat Transfer, Mechanical Engineering Publications, London, 1988
  3. Coleman JW, Garimella S, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 42, 2881, 1999
  4. Kandlikar SG, Grande WJ, Heat Transf. Eng., 24(1), 3, 2003
  5. Venkatesan M, Das SK, Balakrishnan AR, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 35, 531, 2010
  6. Harvel GD, Hori K, Kawanishi K, Chang JS, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 371, 544, 1996
  7. Rzasa MR, Metrology Meas. Systems XIV, 2, 291, 2007
  8. Ahmed WH, Ismail BI, Recent Patents Elect. Eng., 1, 1, 2008
  9. Keska JK, Williams BE, Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci., 19, 1, 1999
  10. Hassan YA, Blanchat TK, Seeley CH, Canaan RE, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 18, 371, 1992
  11. Fairbrother F, Stubbs AE, J. Chem. Soc., 6, 527, 1935
  12. Taylor G, J. Fluid Mech., 10, 161, 1961
  13. Bretherton FP, J. Fluid Mech., 10, 166, 1961
  14. Han Y, Shikazono N, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 31, 631, 2010
  15. Dallman JC, PhD Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 1978
  16. Chen X, Butler T, Brill JP, Proceedings of the ASME Heat Transfer Division at the International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 336, 201, 1996
  17. Schmitt RL, Stevenson WH, Stevenson HC, Proceedings of the Inspections, International Congress of Applications of Measurement and Control Symposium, Lasers and Electro-Optics, 33, 1982
  18. Muduli PR, Pati UC, In Intelligent Computing, Networking, and Informatics, 1, 359, 2014
  19. Dietrich N, Loubiere K, Jimenez M, Hebrard G, Gourdon C, Chem. Eng. Sci., 1, 100, 2013
  20. Mauger C, Mees L, Michard M, Lance M, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 58, 301, 2014
  21. Banerjee R, Kandlikar SG, J. Power Sources, 247, 9, 2014
  22. Jung SU, Park HW, Lee SJ, J. Synchrotron Radiation, 21, 1160, 2014
  23. Liang JY, Appl. Mech. Mater., 511, 550, 2014
  24. Yamada Y, IEEE Conference on Asia-Pacific Synthetic Aperture Radar, 2013
  25. Singh K, Kapoor R, Pattern Recognition Letters, 36, 10, 2014
  26. Mayor TS, Pinto AMFR, Campos JBLM, Chem. Eng. Sci., 63(14), 3614, 2008
  27. Guo F, Yang Y, Chen B, Guo L, Powder Technol., 1, 202, 2010
  28. Kritika I, Shridharani S, Arunkumar S, Venkatesan M, In IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research (ICCIC), DOI:10.1109/ICCIC.2013.6724169., 2013
  29. Eain MG, Egan V, Punch J, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 44, 515, 2013
  30. Venkatesan M, Das SK, Balakrishnan AR, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 35, 531, 2011