Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.32, No.5, 800-807, 2015
Performance and economic analysis of commercial-scale coal-fired power plant with post-combustion CO2 capture
A performance and economic analysis of a commercial-scale coal-fired power plant with a post-combustion CO2 capture process in South Korea was performed. Based on the KoSol Process for CO2 Capture (KPCC) developed by the Korea Electric Power Company Research Institute, a power plant cost model coupled with a performance model was developed to evaluate the levelized cost of electricity and the cost of CO2 avoided for power plants with CCS. A techno-economic evaluation result, based on the general guideline suggested by the IEA task force group and key performance data of the pilot-scale CO2 capture test results showed that at the base case, the LCOE of a commercial-scale USC power plant with CCS in South Korea will increase from 47 USD/tCO2 (without CCS) to 68 USD/tCO2 (with CCS), and the cost of CO2 avoided was calculated as 33 USD/tCO2. Comparing this with various studies in other literature showed that the cost of CO2 avoided for power plants in South Korea was much lower than that of the OECD average, which was mainly due to the relatively low capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operating expenditure (OPEX) of a power plant with/without CCS.
[References]
  1. http://www.tcmda.com/en.
  2. http://www.mhi.co.jp/en/news/story/1209141573.html.
  3. http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/boundary_dam.html.
  4. MIT, The Future of Coal, 2010
  5. Rao AB, Rubin ES, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 4467, 2005
  6. DOE/NETL, Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants, 2007
  7. International Energy Agency, Cost and Performance of Carbon Dioxide Capture from Power Generation, 2010
  8. Lee JH, Korea’s New Pilot Plant, Carbon Capture Journal, Jan/Feb, 2014
  9. International Energy Agency, Projected Costs of Generating Electricity, 2010
  10. IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Criteria for Technical and Economic Assessment of Plants with Low CO2 Emissions, 2009
  11. Lee JH, Kim JH, Lee IY, Jang KR, Shim JG, Development of Amine Absorbents for Post-combustion Capture, 1st Combustion Capture Conference, May, Abu Dhabi, 2011
  12. Lee JH, Kwak NS, Lee IY, Jang KR, Jang SG, Lee KJ, Han GS, Oh DH, Shim JG, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 51(2), 267, 2013
  13. Bolland O, Undrum H, Adv. Environ. Res., 7, 901, 2003
  14. Lee JH, Kwak NS, Lee IY, Jang KR, Shim JG, Performance Analysis of a 500MWe Coal-fired Power Plant with a Post-Combustion CO2 Capture Process, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 2012
  15. Lee JH, Kwak NS, Lee IY, Jang KR, Shim JG, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 50(2), 365, 2012
  16. http://www.kpx.or.kr.
  17. Korea Development Institute, A Study on Standard Guideline for Pre-feasibility Study, 5th Ed., 182-213, 2008
  18. Korea Middle East Power Company, Design Data of Boryeong Coal-Fired Power Plant Unit 7, 2011