Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.31, No.12, 2151-2156, 2014
Comparison of spontaneous combustion susceptibility of coal dried by different processes from low-rank coal
We compared the susceptibility to spontaneous combustion of low-rank coals dried by four different processes: flash drying, fluidized bed drying, non-fried carbon briquetting, and coal-oil slurry dewatering. The coals were characterized by FT-IR and XPS analysis. A crossing-point temperature (CPT) was estimated as a comparison criterion of the susceptibility of the coals to spontaneous combustion. O2, CO, and CO2 emissions during the CPT measurement were also compared. The FT-IR and XPS analysis revealed that some of the oxygen functional groups on the surface of the coal were removed when the coal underwent the drying process. This phenomenon was particularly noticeable in the coal dried by oil. Accordingly, the CPT of the coal that went through this drying process was high. Among the samples, the coals dried by oil showed the highest CPT.
[References]
  1. Mangena SJ, de Korte GJ, McCrindle RI, Morgan DL, Fuel Process. Technol., 85(15), 1647, 2004
  2. Keith C, 2nd Coaltrans Upgrading Coal Forum, Jakarta, Indonesia, September, 2010
  3. Sarunac N, Ness M, Bullinger C, Third international conference on clean coal technologies for our future, Sardinia, Italy, May, 2007
  4. Bullinger C, Ness M, Sarunac N, Kennedy JC, Power Eng., 114(4), 64, 2010
  5. Klutz HJ, Klocker KJ, Lambertz J, VGB PowerTech, 76, 210, 1996
  6. Klutz HJ, http://www.rwe.com/web/cms/mediablob/en/606202/data/88182/2/rwe/innovation/projects-technologies/power-generation/fossil-fired-power-plants/fluidized-bed-drying/Development-status-of-WTA-fluidized-bed-drying-for-lignite-at-RWE-Power-AG-Article-taken-from-Kraftwerkstechnik-Sichere-und-nachhaltige-Energieversorgung-Volume-2-.pdf.
  7. Sugita S, Deguchi T, Shigehisa T, Kobe Steel Eng. Reports, 53, 41, 2003
  8. Umar DF, Usui H, Daulay B, Fuel Process. Technol., 87(11), 1007, 2006
  9. Kinoshita S, Yamamoto S, Deguchi T, Shigehisa T, Kobelco Technol. Review, 29, 93, 2010
  10. Choi H, Thiruppathiraja C, Kim S, Rhim Y, Lim J, Lee S, Fuel Process. Technol., 92(10), 2005, 2011
  11. Pis JJ, Delapuente G, Fuente E, Moran A, Rubiera F, Thermochim. Acta, 279, 93, 1996
  12. Beamish BB, Barakat MA, St George JD, Thermochim. Acta, 362(1-2), 79, 2000
  13. Beamish BB, Int. J. Coal Geol., 64(1-2), 139, 2005
  14. McCutcheon AL, Wilson MA, Energy Fuels, 17(4), 929, 2003
  15. Silva Filho CG, Milioli FE, Quimica Nova, 31, 98, 2008
  16. Itay M, Hill CR, Glasser DA, Fuel Process. Technol., 21, 81, 1989
  17. Wang HH, Dlugogorski BZ, Kennedy EM, Fuel, 81(15), 1913, 2002
  18. Wang H, Dlugogorski BZ, Kennedy EM, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 29, 487, 2003
  19. Wang H, Dlugogorski BZ, Kennedy EM, Combust. Flame, 134(1-2), 107, 2003
  20. Qi X, Wang D, Milke JA, Zhong X, Int. J. Mining Sci. Technol., 22, 169, 2012
  21. Kucuk A, Kadioglu Y, Gulaboglu MS, Combust. Flame, 133(3), 255, 2003
  22. Behera P, Mohanty G, J. Sci. Res., 1, 55, 2009
  23. Xuyao Q, Wang DM, Milke JA, Zhong XX, Mining Sci. Technol., 21, 255, 2011
  24. Jo W, Choi H, Kim S, Yoo J, Chun D, Rhim Y, Lim J, Lee S, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 30(5), 1034, 2013
  25. Kim SD, Lee SH, Rhim YJ, Choi HK, Lim JH, Chun DH, Yoo JH, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 50(1), 106, 2012
  26. Park JH, Shun DW, Bae DH, Lee SH, Seo JH, Park JH, 27th International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, October, 2010
  27. Moon SH, Kim YW, Ryu IS, Lee SJ, J. Energy Eng., 18, 213, 2009
  28. Karthikeyan M, Drying Technol., 26, 948, 2008
  29. Wu B, Hu H, Zhao Y, Jin L, Fang Y, J. Fuel Chem. Technol., 37, 385, 2009