Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.31, No.6, 994-1001, 2014
Optimization of sulfamethoxazole degradation by TiO2/hydroxyapatite composite under ultraviolet irradiation using response surface methodology
A titanium dioxide/hydroxyapatite/ultraviolet (TiO2/HAP/UV-A) system was used to remove sulfamethoxazole (SMX) from water in a second-order response surface methodology (RSM) experiment with a three-level Box-Behnken design (BBD) for optimization. The effects of both the primary and secondary interaction effects of three photocatalytic reaction variables were examined: the concentration of SMX (X1), dose of TiO2/HAP composite (X2), and UV intensity (X3). The UV intensity and TiO2/HAP dose significantly influence the SMX and total organic carbon (TOC) removal (p<0.001). However, the SMX and TOC removal are enhanced with increasing TiO2/HAP dose up to certain levels, and further increases in the TiO2/HAP dose result in adverse effects due to hydroxyl radical scavenging at higher catalyst concentrations. Complete removal of SMX was achieved upon UV-A irradiation for 180 min. Under optimal conditions, 51.2% of the TOC was removed, indicating the formation of intermediate products during SMX degradation. The optimal ratio of SMX (mg L^(-1)) to TiO2/HAP (g L^(-1)) to UV (W/L) was 5.4145 mg L^(-1) to 1.4351 gL^(-1) to 18 W for both SMX and TOC removal. By comparison with actual applications, the experimental results were found to be in good agreement with the model's predictions, with mean results for SMX and TOC removal of 99.89% and 51.01%, respectively.
[References]
  1. Nasuhoglu D, Yargeau V, Berk D, J. Hazard. Mater., 186(1), 67, 2011
  2. Herberer T, J. Hydrol., 266, 175, 2002
  3. Stackelberg PE, Furlong ET, Meyer MT, Zaugg SD, Henderson AK, Reissman DB, Sci. Total Environ., 329, 99, 2004
  4. Alexy R, Kumpel T, Kummerer DK, Chemosphere, 57, 505, 2004
  5. Azema J, Guidetti B, Korolyov A, Kiss R, Roques C, Constant P, Daffe M, Malet-Martino M, European J. Med. Chem., 46, 6025, 2011
  6. Jørgensen SE, Halling-Sørensen B, Chemosphere, 40, 691, 2000
  7. Hu L, Flanders PM, Miller PL, Strathmann TJ, Water Res., 41, 2612, 2007
  8. Tsukada M, Wakamura M, Yoshida N, Watanabe T, J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem., 338(1-2), 18, 2011
  9. Pratap Reddy M, Venugopal A, Subrahmanyam M, Water Res., 41, 379, 2007
  10. Palominos RA, Mora A, Mondaca MA, Perez-Moya M, Mansilla HD, J. Hazard. Mater., 158(2-3), 460, 2008
  11. Kumar A, Prasad B, Mishra IM, J. Hazard. Mater., 150, 174, 2008
  12. Cho IH, Zoh KD, Dyes and Pigments, 75, 533, 2007
  13. Pushpakanth S, Srinivasan B, Sreedhar B, Sastry TP, Mater. Chem. Phys., 107(2-3), 492, 2008
  14. Wang J, Li CW, Luan XY, Li J, Wang BX, Zhang LQ, Xu R, Zhang XD, J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem., 320(1-2), 62, 2010
  15. Xu L, Wang GRLT, Ma FY, Zhao YH, Lu N, Guo YH, Yang X, Appl. Surf. Sci., 258(18), 7039, 2012
  16. Ma N, Zhang Y, Quan X, Water Res., 44, 6104, 2010
  17. Xekoukoulotakis NP, Drosou C, Brebou C, Chatzisymeon E, Hapeshi E, Fatta-Kassinos D, Mantzavinos D, Catal. Today, 161(1), 163, 2011
  18. Herrmann JM, Disdier J, Pichat P, Malato S, Blanco J, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 17(1-2), 15, 1998
  19. Kusvuran E, Irmak S, Yavuz HI, Samil A, Erbatur W, J. Hazard. Mater., 119(1-3), 109, 2005
  20. Abellan MN, Gimenez J, Esplugas S, Catal. Today, 144, 131, 2009
  21. Gonzalez O, Sans C, Esplugas S, J. Hazard. Mater., 146(3), 459, 2007
  22. Ahmaruzzaman M, Sharma DK, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 287(1), 14, 2005
  23. Lin KL, Pan JY, Chen YW, Cheng RM, Xu XC, J. Hazard. Mater., 161(1), 231, 2009
  24. Liu Y, Liu CY, Wei JH, Xiong R, Pan CX, Shi J, Appl. Surf. Sci., 256(21), 6390, 2010
  25. Sheng G, Qiao L, Mou Y, J. Environ. Eng., 137, 611, 2011
  26. Kanai H, Lintuluoto M, Matsumara Y, Moffat JB, J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem., 252(1-2), 181, 2006
  27. Nishikawa H, J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem., 206(1-2), 331, 2003
  28. Reddy MP, Venugopal A, Subrahmanyam M, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 69(3-4), 164, 2007