Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.31, No.4, 676-683, 2014
Comparison between conventional and ultrasound-assisted extractions of natural antioxidants from walnut green husk
Agricultural industries produce substantial quantities of phenolic-rich by-products, which have gained much attention due to their antioxidant properties. Ultrasonic technology was applied for extraction of antioxidants from the walnut green husk using ethanol as a food grade solvent. Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to optimize experimental conditions. The responses were total phenolic content (TPC), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), scavenging activity of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical and yield. TPC varied from 6.28 to 7.23mg GA g^(-1) dry sample. FRAP and DPPH values varied from 0.33 to 0.46 mmol Fe2+ g^(-1) of dry sample and 33.98% to 56.31% inhibition, respectively. Extraction yields ranged from 33.04% to 38.72%. The optimal conditions were 60% ethanolwater mixture as solvent, temperature of 60 ℃ and extraction time of 30 min. Comparison of ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) and conventional extraction was shown that TPC, FRAP, DPPH and yield obtained by UAE during 30 min were significantly higher than by conventional extraction during 16 hours. The extract can be used as substitute of synthetic antioxidants for food products, color and oxidative stabilization.
[References]
  1. Li HR, Yang ZG, Wang J, Kitanaka S, Nat. Prod. Res. Dev., 18, 363, 2006
  2. Pereira JA, Oliveira I, Sousa A, Ferreira ICFR, Bento A, Estevinho L, Food Chem. Toxicol., 46, 2103, 2008
  3. Li L, Tsao R, Yang R, Liu CM, Zhu HH, Young JC, J. Agric. Food Chem., 54, 8033, 2006
  4. Pereira JA, Oliveira I, Sousa A, Valentao P, Andrade PB, Ferreira ICFR, Ferreres F, Bento A, Seabra L, Estevinho R, J. Sci. Food Agric., 45, 2287, 2007
  5. Stampar F, Solar A, Hudina M, Veberic R, Colaric M, Food Chem., 95, 627, 2006
  6. Oliveira I, Sousa SI, Ferreira CFR, Bento A, Estevinho L, Pereira JA, Food Chem. Toxicol., 46, 2326, 2008
  7. Jakopic J, Veberic R, Stamper F, Acta Agr. Slov., 93, 11, 2009
  8. Fernandez-Agullo A, Pereira E, Freire MS, Valentao P, Andrade PB, Gonzalez-Alvarez J, Pereira JA, Ind. Crop. Prod., 42, 126, 2013
  9. Finkel T, Holbrook NJ, Nature, 408, 239, 2000
  10. Mates JM, Segura JA, Alonso FJ, Marquez J, Mini Rev. Med. Chem., 9, 1202, 2009
  11. Valko M, Leibfritz D, Moncol J, Cronin MTD, Mazur M, Telser J, Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol., 39, 44, 2007
  12. Bhanger MI, Iqbal S, Anwar F, Imran M, Akhtar M, Ziaul-Haq M, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 43, 779, 2008
  13. Farag RS, Mohamoud EA, Basuny AM, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 42, 107, 2007
  14. Vilkhu K, Mawson R, Simons L, Bates D, Innov. Food Sci. Emerg., 9, 161, 2008
  15. Khan MK, Maryline AV, Fabiano-Tixier AS, Dangles O, Chemat F, Food Chem.,, 119, 851, 2010
  16. Chemat F, Tomao V, Virot M, Ultrasound-assisted extraction in food analysis, in: Semih Otles (Ed.), Handbook of food analysis instruments, CRC Press, USA, 85, 2008
  17. Pinelo M, Rubilar M, Jerez M, Sineiro J, Nunez MJ, J. Agric. Food Chem., 53, 2111, 2005
  18. Bartnik DD, Mohler CM, Houlihan M, US Patent, 20,060,088,627, April 27, 2006
  19. Liyana-Pathirana C, Shahidi F, Food Chem., 93, 47, 2005
  20. Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C, LWT - Food Sci. Technol., 28, 25, 1995
  21. Pulido R, Bravo L, Saura-Calixto F, J. Agric. Food Chem., 48, 3396, 2000