Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.31, No.3, 485-489, 2014
Enhanced skin delivery and characterization of rutin-loaded ethosomes
We formulated rutin-loaded ethosomes and compared their vesicle size, loading efficiency, stability, and elasticity. In addition, an in vitro skin penetration experiment was performed. The results of the study indicated that ethosomes loaded with 0.005-0.03% rutin were stable during the four-week study period. Among them, those loaded with 0.03% rutin showed a vesicle size (190.20±14.57 nm) and loading efficiency (73.77%±0.01%). Therefore, the in vitro skin penetration experiment was performed using 0.03% rutin-loaded ethosome. Compared to an ethanolic solution of rutin (44.16%), rutin-loaded liposome (37.80%), and a distilled water (DW) solution of rutin (18.31%), rutin-loaded ethosome (93.31 μg; 61.30%) was superior in delivering rutin. Therefore, we suggest that ethosome loaded with 0.03% rutin enhance the skin penetration of rutin and may be used as a drug delivery system for natural cosmetic materials such as flavonoids.
[References]
  1. Lee HJ, Park SN, J. Soc. Cosmet. Scientists Korea, 37(2), 143, 2011
  2. Yang HJ, Ahn YJ, Kim JH, Park SN, J. Soc. Cosmet. Scientists Korea, 34(3), 189, 2008
  3. Kim JE, Kim WY, Kim JW, Park HS, Lee SH, Lee SY, Kim MJ, Kim AR, Park SN, J. Soc. Cosmet. Scientists Korea, 36(4), 303, 2010
  4. Park SN, Kim SY, Lim GN, Jo NR, Lee MH, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 18(2), 680, 2012
  5. Luo H, Jiang BH, King SM, Chen YC, Nutrition and Cancer, 60(6), 800, 2008
  6. Diana M, Agata K, Stefan K, IUBMB Life, 41, 1067, 1997
  7. Lee KJ, Row KH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 23(5), 779, 2006
  8. Zuorro A, Lavecchia R, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 28(10), 1965, 2011
  9. Park SN, Lim MS, Park MA, Kwon SS, Han SB, Polym.(Korea), 36(6), 705, 2012
  10. Choi KY, Min KH, Park JH, Kim KM, Jung SY, Polym. Sci. Technol., 20(3), 216, 2009
  11. Jin BS, Han YM, Lee KH, Choi MJ, J. Korean Ind. Eng. Chem., 15(2), 205, 2004
  12. Bae SK, Kim JC, Jee UK, Kim JD, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 16(1), 56, 1999
  13. Gwak HJ, Jin BS, J. Korean Ind. Eng. Chem., 18(2), 130, 2007
  14. An EJ, Kang CK, Kim JW, Jin BS, Korean Ind. Chem. News, 13(4), 24, 2010
  15. Elsayed MMA, Abdallah OY, Naggar VF, Khalafallah NM, Int. J. Pharm., 332, 1, 2007
  16. Kim JE, Lee HJ, Lim MS, Park MA, Park SN, J. Soc. Cosmet. Scientists Korea, 38(1), 15, 2012
  17. Lim MS, Han SB, Kwon SS, Park MA, Park SN, J. Soc. Cosmet. Scientists Korea, 38(2), 147, 2012
  18. Park SN, Lee MH, Kim SJ, Yu ER, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 435(3), 361, 2013
  19. Touitou E, Dayan N, Bergelson L, Godin B, Eliaz M, J. Control. Release, 65, 403, 2000
  20. Touitou E, Godin B, Weiss C, Drug Dev. Res., 50, 406, 2000
  21. Dubey V, Mishra D, Dutta T, Nahar M, Saraf DK, Jain NK, J. Control. Release, 123, 148, 2007
  22. Fang YP, Tsai YH, Wu PC, Huang YB, Int. J. Pharm., 356, 144, 2008
  23. Paolino D, Lucania G, Mardente D, Alhaique F, Fresta M, J. Control. Release, 106, 99, 2005
  24. Fang YP, Huang YB, Wu PC, Tsai YH, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 73, 391, 2009
  25. Maria M, Caddeo C, Sinico C, Valenti D, Mostallino MC, Biggio G, Fadda AM, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 78, 27, 2011
  26. Jain S, Tiwary AK, Sapra B, Jain NK, AAPS PharmSciTech., 8, E1, 2007
  27. Jain S, Jain P, Jain NK, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 29, 1013, 2003
  28. Park SN, Lee HJ, Kim HS, Park MA, Gu HA, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 30(3), 688, 2013
  29. Osanai S, Nakamura K, Biomaterials, 21, 9, 2000