Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.31, No.2, 304-309, 2014
Synthesis of polymer membranes of different porosity and their application for phenol removal from liquid phase
Preparation of polymeric membranes based on polyethersulfone (PES) modified by adding different amounts of a pore-forming agent (PVP) is presented, and potential application of the membranes obtained for removal of phenol from the liquid phase is examined. The addition of various amounts of PVP has been shown to bring about changes in the content of the surface oxygen groups, but has no significant effect on the chemical character of the groups and acidic groups dominate. Filtration by phenol solution leads to significant changes in the total content of surface oxides; however, the acidic groups remain dominant. Membranes characterized by higher porosity exhibited more stable and higher rejection ratio for phenol removal. Although all the membranes were characterized by similar rejection ratios for phenol removal, the cake resistance (Rc) and pore resistance (Rp) values were found to depend significantly on the structure and porosity of the membrane applied for filtration.
[References]
  1. Akthakul A, McDonald WF, Mayes AM, J. Membr. Sci., 208(1-2), 147, 2002
  2. Li NN, Fane AG, Winston Ho WS, Matsuura T, Advanced membrane technology and applications, Wiley, New Jersey, 2008
  3. Pabby AK, Rizvi SSH, Sastre AM, Membrane separations- chemical, pharmaceutical, food, and biotechnological applications, Taylor & Francis (CRC Press), New York, 2009
  4. Shin SJ, Kim JP, Kim HJ, Jeon JH, Min BR, Desalination, 186(1-3), 1, 2005
  5. Cheryan M, Ultrafiltration and microfiltration handbook, Technomic Publishing Company, Lancaster, PA, 1998
  6. Vankelecom IFJ, Chem. Rev., 102(10), 3779, 2002
  7. Zhao WF, Huang JY, Fang BH, Nie SQ, Yi N, Su BH, Li HF, Zhao CS, J. Membr. Sci., 369(1-2), 258, 2011
  8. Meincken M, Roux SP, Jacobs EP, Appl. Surf. Sci., 252(5), 1772, 2005
  9. Yang RT, Adsorbents: Fundamentals and applications, Wiley, New York, 2003
  10. Bhatnagar A, J. Hazard. Mater., 139(1), 93, 2007
  11. Din ATM, Hameed BH, Ahmad AL, J. Hazard. Mater., 161(2-3), 1522, 2009
  12. Noll KE, Gournaris V, Hou WS, Adsorption technology for air and water pollution control, Lewis, Chelsea MI, 1992
  13. Nakagawa K, Namba A, Mukai SR, Tamon H, Ariyadejwanich P, Tanthapanichakoon W, Water Res., 38, 1791, 2004
  14. Ozkaya B, J. Hazard. Mater., 129(1-3), 158, 2006
  15. Kataoka T, Nishiki T, Kimura S, J. Membr. Sci., 41, 197, 1989
  16. Kujawski W, Warszawski A, Ratajczak W, Porebski T, Capala W, Ostrowska I, Desalination, 163(1-3), 287, 2004
  17. Basile A, Gallucci F, Membranes for Membrane Reactors. Preparation, optimalization and selection, Wiley, New York, 2011
  18. Wan YH, Wang XD, Zhang XJ, J. Membr. Sci., 135(2), 263, 1997
  19. Kojima T, Nishijima K, Matsukata M, J. Membr. Sci., 102, 43, 1995
  20. CF Schutte, Desalination, 158(1-3), 285, 2003
  21. Ben-Daid A, Bason S, Jopp J, Oren Y, Freger V, J. Membr. Sci., 281(1-2), 480, 2006
  22. Pereira CC, Habert AC, Nobrega R, Borges CP, J. Membr. Sci., 138(2), 227, 1998
  23. Wu P, Field RW, England R, Brisdon BJ, J. Membr. Sci., 190(2), 147, 2001
  24. Hofman M, Pietrzak R, Chem. Eng. J., 170(1), 202, 2011