Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.30, No.4, 937-948, 2013
Hydrogen recovery from Tehran refinery off-gas using pressure swing adsorption, gas absorption and membrane separation technologies: Simulation and economic evaluation
Hydrogen recovery from Tehran refinery off-gas was studied using simulation of PSA (pressure swing adsorption), gas absorption processes and modeling as well as simulation of polymeric membrane process. Simulation of PSA process resulted in a product with purity of 0.994 and recovery of 0.789. In this process, mole fraction profiles of all components along the adsorption bed were investigated. Furthermore, the effect of adsorption pressure on hydrogen recovery and purity was examined. By simulation of one-stage membrane process using co-current model, a hydrogen purity of 0.983 and recovery of 0.95 were obtained for stage cut of 0.7. Also, flow rates and mole fractions were investigated both in permeate and retentate. Then, effects of pressure ratio and membrane area on product purity and recovery were studied. In the simulation of the gas absorption process, gasoline was used as a solvent and product with hydrogen purity of 0.95 and recovery of 0.942 was obtained. Also, the effects of solvent flow rate, absorption temperature, and pressure on product purity and recovery were studied. Finally, these three processes were compared economically. The results showed that the PSA process with total cost of US$ 1.29 per 1 kg recovered H2 is more economical than the other two processes (feed flow rate of 115.99 kmol/h with H2 purity of 72.4 mol%).
[References]
  1. Ramachandran R, Menon RK, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 23(7), 593, 1998
  2. Hallale N, Liu F, Adv. Environ. Res., 6, 81, 2001
  3. Birjandi MRS, Shahraki F, Chem. Eng. Technol., 34(12), 1974, 2011
  4. Bernardo P, Drioli E, Pet. Chem., 50(4), 271, 2010
  5. Fonseca A, Sa V, Bento H, Tavares MLC, Pinto G, Gomes LACN, J. Cleaner Production., 16, 1755, 2008
  6. Mapiour M, Sundaramurthy V, Dalai AK, Adjaye J, Energy Fuels, 23, 2129, 2009
  7. Mehra YR, Al-Abdulal AH, Hydrogen Purification in Hydroprocessing, 103rd NPRA Annual Meeting, San Francisco, California USA, March 13-15, 2005
  8. Peramanu S, Cox BG, Pruden BB, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 24(5), 405, 1999
  9. Al-Rabiah AA, Membrane Technology for Hydrogen Separation in Ethylene Plants, 4th Ibero-American Congress on Membrane Science and Technology (CITEM), Brazil, July 16-18, 2003
  10. Kaldis SP, Kapantaidakis GC, Sakellaropoulos GP, J. Membr. Sci., 173(1), 61, 2000
  11. Malek AH, Farooq S, AIChE J., 44(9), 1985, 1998
  12. Yavary M, Ale-Ebrahim H, Falamaki C, Chem. Eng. Sci., 66(12), 2587, 2011
  13. Yang JY, Lee CH, Chang JW, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 36(7), 2789, 1997
  14. Baker RW, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 41(6), 1393, 2002
  15. Peramanu S, Absorption-Stripping Process for the Purification of High Pressure Hydrogen: Solubility, Mass Transfer and Simulation Studies, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Calgary, Canada, 1998
  16. Malek A, Farooq S, AIChE J., 43(3), 761, 1997
  17. Li K, Acharya DR, Hughes R, J. Membr. Sci., 52, 205, 1990
  18. Shokri S, Ganji H, Ahmadi Marvast M, Bazmi M, Petroleum & Coal., 50, 1, 2008
  19. Seider WD, Seader JD, Product and process design principles,2th Ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2004