Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.27, No.6, 1675-1680, 2010
Data-driven prediction model of indoor air quality in an underground space
Several data-driven prediction methods based on multiple linear regression (MLR), neural network (NN), and recurrent neural network (RNN) for the indoor air quality in a subway station are developed and compared. The RNN model can predict the air pollutant concentrations at a platform of a subway station by adding the previous temporal information of the pollutants on yesterday to the model. To optimize the prediction model, the variable importance in the projection (VIP) of the partial least squares (PLS) is used to select key input variables as a preprocessing step. The prediction models are applied to a real indoor air quality dataset from telemonitoring systems data (TMS), which exhibits some nonlinear dynamic behaviors show that the selected key variables have strong influence on the prediction performances of the models. It demonstrates that the RNN model has the ability to model the nonlinear and dynamic system, and the predicted result of the RNN model gives better modeling performance and higher interpretability than other data-driven prediction models.
[References]
  1. Kim NJ, Lee SS, Jeon JS, Kim JH, Kim MY, Evaluation of factors to affect PM-10 concentration in subway station, Proceedings of KOSAE, 571, 2006
  2. Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Levels of particulate air pollution, its elemental compositions, determinants and health effects in metro systems, Atmospheric Environ., 7995, 2007
  3. Jung SH, Improved recurrent neural networks for grammatical inference, Ph. D thesis, KAIST, Korea, 2000
  4. Pan YD, Sung SW, Lee JH, Control Eng. Practice, 9, 859, 2001
  5. Pai TY, Environ. Eng. Sci., 25, 757, 2008
  6. Montgomery DC, Runger GC, Hubele NF, Engineering statistics- 3rd Ed., WILEY, USA, 2004
  7. Walpole RE, Myers RH, Myers SL, Ye K, Probability & statistics for engineers & scientists-8th Ed., Pearson Education International, USA, 2007
  8. Himmelblau DM, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 47(16), 5782, 2008
  9. Choi DJ, Park HK, J. Korean Soc. Water Quality, 17, 87, 2001
  10. Nguyen DV, Rocke DM, Bioinformatics, 18, 1216, 2002
  11. Markovic DM, Markovic DA, Jovanovic A, Lazic L, Mijic Z, Environ. Monit. Assess., 145, 349, 2008