Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.23, No.1, 43-56, 2006
Application of computational fluid dynamics analysis for improving performance of commercial scale selective catalytic reduction
The performance of commercial scale selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system is strongly dependant upon the degree of mixing between NH3 and NOx or NH3 concentration distribution at the catalyst layer according to the reaction kinetics of SCR catalysts. Insufficient mixing of the reduction agent and NOx mass flow necessitates an uneconomically large catalyst volume and high NH3 slip to meet the required NOx emission values. The effective methodology which can increase the performance of commercial scale SCR through improving NH3 concentration distribution at the catalyst layer using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was suggested and applied to the real operations. The operation results have shown that the performance of commercial SCR was improved from 54.4% to 74.8% as NH3 concentration deviation at the catalyst layer was reduced from 23.6% to 8.6%. It is established that the increase of NH3 concentration uniformity at the catalyst layer contributes to improvement of performance of commercial scale SCR.
[References]
  1. Adams B, Cremer M, Valentine J, Bhamidipati V, Letcavits J, O'Connor D, Vierstra S, Use of CFD modeling for design of NOx reduction systems in utility boilers, Proceeding of the 2002 International Joint Power Generation Conference, ASME, Phoenix, AZ, 2002
  2. Arbind P, The National Environmental Journal, 46, 1995
  3. Bruce I, The American Ceramic Society Bulletin, 81, 1995
  4. Fluent User's Guide, Version 6.1; Fluent: Lebanon, NH, 1998
  5. Freek K, Lydia S, Nico JJD, Jacob AM, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 445, 32, 1993
  6. Heck RM, Chen JM, Speronello BK, Environ. Prog., 221, 13, 1994
  7. Jaime B, Progress engineering and design for air pollution control, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1993
  8. Jiri S, Natale F, Pio F, Enrico T, Fiorenzo B, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1053, 32, 1993
  9. Kenneth JF, John HC, Oil Gas J., 56, 1993
  10. Kevin R, Mel A, Michael V, Numerical modeling for design optimization of SCR applications, ICAC NOx Forum Washington D.C., 2000
  11. Kevin R, Milobowski M, Wooldridge B, Perspectives on ammonia injection and gaseous static mixing in SCR retrofit applications, EPRI-DOE-EPA Combined Utility Air Pollutant Control Symposium, Washington D.C., 1999
  12. Kokkinos A, Nelson N, Stirgwolt W, Structural considerations for SCR retrofits, EPRI-DOE-EPA Combined Utility Air Pollutant Control Symposium, Washington D.C., 1999
  13. Kotter M, Lintz HG, Int. Chem. Eng., 685, 31, 1991
  14. Launder BE, Spalding DB, Mathematical models of turbulence, Academic Press, London, England, 1972
  15. Pantankar SV, Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington D.C., 1980
  16. Ralf S, Cindy K, Edward H, "Enhance ammonia distribution for maximum SCR performance", Institute of Clean Air Companies Forum 2003, 4, Oct., 2003
  17. Sayre A, Milobowski M, Validation of numerical models of flow through SCR units, EPRI-DOE-EPA Combined Utility Air Pollutant Control Symposium, Washington D.C., 1999