Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.28, No.3, 667-673, 2011
Performance assessment of cascade controllers for nitrate control in a wastewater treatment process
A cascade control strategy is proposed to the benchmark simulation model 1 (BSM1) to enhance the treatment performance of nitrogen removal in a biological wastewater treatment plant. The proposed control approach consists of two control loops, a primary outer loop and a secondary inner loop. The method has two controllers of which the primary loop has a model predictive control (MPC) controller and the secondary loop has a proportional-integralderivative (PID) controller, which is a cascade MPC-PID controller. The primary MPC controller is to control the nitrate concentration in the effluent, and the secondary PID controller is to control the nitrate concentration in the final anoxic compartment. The proposed method controls the nitrate concentrations in the effluent as well as in the final anoxic reactor simultaneously to strictly satisfy the quality of the effluent as well as to remove the effects of disturbances more quickly by manipulating the external carbon dosage rate. Because the control performance assessment (CPA) technique has the features of determining the capability of the current controller and locating the best achievable performance, the other novelty of this paper is to suggest a relative closed-loop potential index (RCPI) which updates the CPA technology into a closed-loop cascade controller. The proposed method is compared with a cascade PID-PID control strategy and the original PID controller in BSM1 and an improved performance of the suggested cascade MPC-PID controller is obtained by using the CPA approach.
[References]
  1. Isaacs SH, Henze M, Søeberg H, Kummel M, Water Res., 28, 511, 1994
  2. Isaacs SH, Henze M, Water Res., 29, 77, 1995
  3. Alex J, Beteau JF, Copp JB, Hellinga C, Jeppsson U, Marsili Libelli S, Pons M, Spanjers H, Vanhooren H, European Control Conference 99, Germany: Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, 1999
  4. Copp J, The cost simulation benchmark: Description and simulator manual, Office for official publications of the European Community, 2002
  5. Alex J, Benedetti L, Copp J, Gernaey K, Jeppsson U, Nopens I, Pons M, Rieger L, Rosen C and Steyer J, Report by the IWA Task Taskgroup on Benchmarking of Control Strategies for WWTPs, 2008
  6. Lindberg C, Carlsson B, Water Sci. Technol., 34, 173, 1996
  7. Yuan Z, Bogaert H, Vanrolleghem P, Thoeye C, Vansteenkiste G, Verstraete W, J. Environ. Eng., 123, 1080, 1997
  8. Barros P, Carlsson B, Water Sci. Technol., 37, 95, 1998
  9. Singman J, Uppsala University, Uppsala, 1999
  10. Cho J, Sung S, Lee I, Water Sci. Technol., 45, 53, 2002
  11. Jelali M, Control Eng. Pract., 14, 441, 2006
  12. Yoo CK, Kim DS, Cho JH, Choi SW, Lee IB, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 18(4), 408, 2001
  13. Henze M, Grady CPL Jr , Gujer W, Marais GVR, Matsuo T, IAWPRC Scientific and Technicat Report No. 1, Bristol, 1987
  14. Henze M, Grady CPL Jr, Gujer W, Marais GVR, Matsuo T, Water Res., 21, 505, 1987
  15. Takacs I, Patry G, Nolasco D, Water Res., 25, 1263, 1991
  16. Vanhooren H and Nguyen K, University of Ghent and University of Ottawa, Belgium, 1996
  17. Franks RG, Worley CW, Ind. Eng. Chem., 48, 1074, 1956
  18. Lee YH, Park SW, Lee JH, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 39(1), 92, 2000
  19. Shen WH, Chen XQ, Corriou JP, Comput. Chem. Eng., 32(12), 2849, 2008
  20. Shen WH, Chen XQ, Pons MN, Corriou JP, Chem. Eng. J., 155(1-2), 161, 2009
  21. Harris TJ, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 67, 856, 1989
  22. Qin SJ, Comput. Chem. Eng., 23(2), 173, 1998
  23. Huang B and Shah S, Performance assessment of control loops: Theory and applications, Springer, 1999
  24. Qin SJ, Yu J, J. Process Control, 17(3), 221, 2007
  25. Huang B and Kadali R, Dynamic modeling, predictive control and performance monitoring: A data-driven subspace approach, Springer Verlag, 2008
  26. Horch A, Dumont G, Int. J. Adapt. Control., 17, 523, 2003
  27. Yuan QL, Lennox B, McEwan M, J. Process Control, 19(5), 751, 2009
  28. Huang B, Ding SX, Thornhill N, J. Process Control, 16(5), 457, 2006
  29. Astrom KJ, Hagglund T, Automatica., 20, 645, 1984
  30. Sung S, Lee J, Lee I, Process identification and pid control, Wiley-Blackwell, 2009
  31. Zhu Y, Multivariable system identification for process control, Elsevier Science, 2001
  32. Ljung L, System identification: Theory for the user, Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1999
  33. Maciejowski JM, Predictive control with constraints, Prentice-Hall, 2002
  34. Seborg D, Edgar T and Mellichamp D, Process dynamics and control, Wiley, 2004