Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.27, No.6, 1860-1863, 2010
Influence of disinfection on bacterial regrowth in pilot distribution system
A correlation between heterotrophic plate count (HPC) and chloramine residual in pilot distribution systems (PDSs) was investigated. The data was derived from an AWWARF (the Awwa Research Foundation) and Tampa Bay Water tailored collaboration project to determine the effect of blending different waters on distribution system water quality. Seven different finished waters were produced from surface, ground, or simulated brackish water sources on site and fed to 18 independent PDSs, either as a single finished water or as a blend of several finished waters. Significantly higher numbers for PDS HPC were observed below 0.06 mg/L of combined chlorine residual. Changes in assimilable organic carbon (AOC) levels between influent and effluent of the PDSs increased as disinfectant dosage decreased in distribution systems. Significant differences between input and output AOC (ΔAOC) were observed when the chloramine residual was less than 1.0 mg/L, and particularly when less than 0.5 mg/L. High HPC counts often occurred when chloramine residual was less than 0.5 mg/L, regardless of AOC levels or AOC stability. However AOC instability could occur at high influent AOC levels even in the presence of residual greater than 0.5 mg/L, with corresponding high HPC counts.
[References]
  1. Geldreich EE, Nash HD, Reasoner DJ, Taylor RH, J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 64, 596, 1972
  2. Maul A, Shaarawi EL, Block JC, Sci. Total Environ., 44, 201, 1985
  3. Maul A, Shaarawi EL, Block JC, Sci. Total Environ., 44, 215, 1985
  4. Lechevallier MW, Babcock TM, Lee RG, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 53, 2714, 1987
  5. Candy JP, Angels ML, Water Res., 35, 2677, 2001
  6. Ollos PJ, Slawson RM, Huck PM, Wat. Sci. Tech., 38, 275, 1998
  7. Lechevallier MW, Lowry CD, Lee RG, Gibbon DL, J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 82, 87, 1990
  8. Skadsen J, J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 85, 95, 1993
  9. Power K, Nagy LA, Report No. 4 Urban Water Research Association of Australia, Melbourne, Vic. 16, 1989
  10. Neden DG, Jones RJ, Smith JR, Kirmeyer GJ, Foust GW, J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 84, 80, 1992
  11. Debeer D, Srinivasan R, Stewart PS, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 60, 4339, 1994
  12. Van der kooij D, Veenendaal HR, Baars-Lorist C, Van der klift DW, Drost YC, Water Res., 23, 1313, 1995
  13. Jones K, Bradshaw SB, J. Appl. Bacteriol., 80, 458, 1996
  14. Norton CD, Lechevallier MW, J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 89, 66, 1997
  15. Momba MNB, Cloete TE, Venter SN, Kfir R, Water Sci. Technol., 38, 2863, 1998
  16. Vikesland PJ, Valentine RL, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 83, 2000
  17. Smith SE, Ta T, Holt DM, Delanoue A, Colbourne JS, Chamberlain AHL, Lloyd BJ, J. Inst. Water Environ. Manage., 13, 7, 1999
  18. Hallam NB, West JR, Forster CF, Simms J, Water Res., 35, 4063, 2001
  19. Niquette P, Servais P, Savoir R, Water Res., 35, 675, 2001
  20. Zhang W, Digiano FA, Water Res., 36, 1469, 2002
  21. American Public Health Association: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th Ed., Washington, DC, 1995
  22. Lechevallier MW, Lowry CD, Lee RG, Gibbon DL, J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 85, 111, 1993
  23. Van der kooij D, J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 84, 57, 1992
  24. Escobar I, Randall AA, J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 91, 76, 1999
  25. Escobar I, Randall AA, Water Res., 34, 1680, 2000
  26. Escobar I, Randall AA, Water Res., 35, 4444, 2001