ISSN: 0256-1115 (print version) ISSN: 1975-7220 (electronic version)
Copyright © 2026 KICHE. All rights reserved

Articles & Issues

Language
English
Conflict of Interest
In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Publication history
Received June 6, 2025
Revised September 30, 2025
Accepted November 6, 2025
Available online February 25, 2026
articles This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.

Latest issues

Advancement in Electrolyte Materials for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

Sustainable Process Engineering Centre (SPEC), Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya 1Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia 2Kulliyyah of Architecture and Environmental Design, International Islamic University 3Department of Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 4Polymer Research Center, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
fairus.rabuni@um.edu.my, faidzulhakim.adnan@um.edu.my
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, February 2026, 43(3), 593-631(39)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-025-00601-2

Abstract

Solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) electrolytes has advanced from conventional oxide-ion conductors such as YSZ to sophisticated

proton-conducting and co-ionic systems. This review synthesises progress across oxide-, proton- and dual-ion-conducting

families within a harmonised 500–800 °C window, using mainly a single cell-level reporting schema. By centring

the comparison at the cell level, we assemble state-of-the-art demonstrations and map them onto a durability framework

that makes performance limits and degradation risks explicit. Tables 7 and 8 convert materials insights into stack-relevant

guidance, enabling like-for-like benchmarking that is reproducible and decision-oriented. Three messages emerge where

oxide-ion systems are the most mature and stack-ready, yet ≤ 650 °C operation is constrained by residual ohmic losses

and cathode surface-exchange kinetics, even with sub-micrometre membranes. Protonic cells deliver high conductivity and

competitive power at 500–650 °C but require chemical robustness against CO2/H2O to stabilise Ba-containing perovskites.

Dual-ion electrolytes spanning engineered semiconductor-ionic heterostructures and composite co-ionic designs achieve

attractive outputs near 500–550 °C, although long-term stability is constrained by secondary-phase volatility, coarsening

and interfacial drift. Architecture and processing are decisive levers: dense ultrathin electrolytes with targeted interlayers,

bilayer/multilayer stacks, space-charge/strain-engineered heterostructures and thin-film routes complement scalable

tape-casting, screen printing, extrusion and micro-tubular formats. We prioritise chemically robust protonics; stabilised

co-ionic systems with engineered interfaces; cathode-electrolyte pairings qualified under realistic fuels and humidities; and

standardised reporting that ties electrochemical diagnostics and post-mortem analysis to fade metrics. This framework provides

decision-oriented evidence to guide device design, operating policy and scale-up from record single cells to stacks.

The Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers. F5,119, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
TEL. No. +82-2-458-3078FAX No. +82-507-804-0669E-mail : kiche@kiche.or.kr

Copyright (C) KICHE.all rights reserved.

- Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 상단으로