Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received March 9, 2026
Accepted April 28, 2026
Available online August 25, 2026
-
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits
unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Latest issues
Phase-Splitting and CO2 Enrichment in Water-Lean Polyether Biphasic Solvents for CO2 Capture
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-026-00738-8
Abstract
Biphasic absorbents have attracted considerable attention because they can reduce the energy requirements of solvent
regeneration during CO2 capture. In this study, a water-lean biphasic solvent system was developed by introducing polyether
solvents into an aqueous amine solution. As the n-octanol-water partition coefficient (log P) of the polyether solvents
increased, the solvent system transitioned from a homogeneous phase to a liquid-liquid biphasic system during
CO2 absorption. Solvent screening identified the 3-(methylamino)propylamine (MAPA) / triethylene glycol monobutyl
ether (TEGMBE) /water system as a promising formulation due to its high cyclic capacity and low viscosity. 13C NMR
analysis revealed that CO2 absorption products such as MAPA-carbamate, protonated MAPA, and CO3
2-/ HCO3- were predominantly located in the lower phase. TEGMBE was predominantly distributed in the upper phase and functions as a physically inert phase-separating component. The cyclic loading and volume distribution of the rich phase were affected
by TEGMBE concentration. When the TEGMBE content is 50 wt%, the CO2-rich phase loading (αrich) and corresponding
cyclic capacity (Δα) within the rich phase reached 279 gCO2/Lsolvent and 143 gCO2/Lsolvent, respectively, representing
increases of 250% in rich loading and 220% in cyclic capacity compared with a conventional 5 M monoethanolamine
(MEA) aqueous solution. In addition, the volume of the CO2 rich phase was reduced by 54% relative to the MEA aqueous
solution. This high concentration significantly reduces the liquid volume to be processed in the subsequent regeneration
step, thereby offering substantial potential for energy savings in the desorber.

