Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received August 11, 2025
Revised September 8, 2025
Accepted September 12, 2025
Available online January 25, 2026
-
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits
unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Latest issues
Anionic Micropollutant Removal by Ion‑Exchange Resin Amberjet4200: Experimental Evaluation and QSAR Modeling
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-025-00564-4
Abstract
Anion-exchange resins are widely used for removing anionic micropollutants from aqueous environments, yet predictive
understanding across structurally diverse pollutants remains limited. To address this gap, we present the first combined experimental–
computational QSAR framework for anion-exchange resins that explicitly incorporates a concentration-dependent
descriptor, namely activity degree of the ion (log α). Adsorption isotherms of 26 anionic compounds were systematically
measured on Amberjet™ 4200 at multiple initial concentrations, providing a robust experimental dataset. Two complementary
descriptor sets were employed for model development: (i) empirically derived linear free energy relationship (LFER)
parameters and (ii) in silico-calculated COSMOtherm descriptors. Incorporating log α into both frameworks substantially
improved accuracy, reflecting the critical role of ionic strength and activity effects in adsorption processes. The optimized
models achieved excellent predictive power, with training R2 values > 0.93 and external validation using test set yielding
R2 = 0.938 (SE = 0.193 log units) for the LFER-based model and R2 = 0.953 (SE = 0.150 log units) for the COSMOthermbased
model. Analysis of LFER descriptor contributions revealed that the excess molar refractivity term had a negative
coefficient—suggesting that electronic lone pairs, hydrogen-bond acidity, and volume-related lipophilic effects exert a
repulsive influence on adsorption—whereas polar interaction and hydrogen-bond basicity terms showed positive coefficients,
indicating that these interactions enhance adsorption affinity. Comparative analysis further indicated that COSMOtherm
descriptors more effectively captured electronic and solvation effects, whereas LFER descriptors provided clearer mechanistic
interpretability. This study establishes a versatile framework for predictive evaluation of anionic micropollutant adsorption,
providing mechanistic insights and supporting the preliminary assessment of adsorbent suitability for structurally novel or
data-scarce pollutants.

