Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received November 9, 2025
Revised January 26, 2026
Accepted April 5, 2026
Available online July 25, 2026
-
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits
unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
All issues
SOHIO Process Legacy Waste Treatment: Antimony(V) Removal from Sulfate Media Using Organic Polymeric Ion Exchange Resins
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-026-00720-4
Abstract
The feasibility of employing an ion-exchange resin for the recovery of antimony(V) from an industrial waste effluent has
been investigated. The source of the effluent is a treatment process designed to reduce the volume of a spent uraniumantimony
catalyst prior to its immobilisation and disposal in South Korea; known as the SENSEI Process. Commercial
macroporous-type cation (Strong acid cation, Mitsubishi DIAION PK216) and anion (Strong base anion Type I, Mitsubishi
DIAION PA316; Strong base anion Type II, Mitsubishi DIAION PA418) exchange resins, as well as macroporous-type
chelation resins (Aminophosphonic acid, Lanxess LEWATIT TP260; Sulfonic-phosphonic acid, Purolite MTS957) have
undergone batchwise screening. LEWATIT TP260 showed the best antimony removal from sulfuric acid solutions across
the entire [H+
] range tested (0.01 mM – 2 M) and showed no loss of removal performance as a function of increasing
sulfate concentration at high [H+
]. The Hill isotherm model produced the best fit for antimony binding to LEWATIT
TP260 (Adj. R2=0.9969), corresponding to an equilibrium adsorption capacity of 160.55 mg g−1. Second order kinetics
(Adj. R2=0.9808) best described the kinetic uptake of antimony onto the TP260 resin indicating a chemisorption mechanism.
The presence of phosphate [PO4
3−] had a negligible impact on antimony removal by TP260, however, the presence
of molybdate [MoO4
2−] and silica, both found in the SENSEI effluent stemming from the original catalyst, significantly
reduced the performance of TP260.

