Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received November 14, 2025
Revised January 19, 2026
Accepted January 28, 2026
Available online June 26, 2026
-
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits
unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
All issues
Techno-Economic Assessment of CO2 Mineral Carbonation Process Using FGD Gypsum for Co-Production of Value-Added Calcium Carbonate and Ammonium Sulfate
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-026-00668-5
Abstract
This study investigates an integrated CO2 mineral carbonation process that utilizes flue gas-derived CO2, ammonia, and
flue gas desulfurization gypsum (FGDG)—a byproduct of desulfurization processes—for the co-production of calcium
carbonate (CaCO3) and ammonium sulfate ((NH4)2SO4). A process design is conducted for a 300,000 tonne/yr commercial-scale
plant, modeling the entire FGDG-NH4OH-CO2 system from pretreatment to crystallization. Following this, a
detailed techno-economic assessment (TEA) is performed, calculating the discounted cash flow based on comprehensive
economic parameters. Under the base case scenario, the annual Levelized Net Profit (LNP) is estimated to be 3,915,064
USD/yr, which corresponds to 43 USD per ton of fixed CO2. Additional case studies consider various scenarios such as
the free provision of FGDG, variations in ammonia pricing, and inclusion of carbon credit pricing, indicating a potential
increase in profitability of up to 241%. Sensitivity analysis identifies the selling price of ammonium sulfate and utility
costs as the most influential variables affecting profitability, confirming that ensuring raw material price stability and
improving energy efficiency are critical strategies for enhancing economic performance. Additional sensitivity analyses
are performed to account for uncertainties associated with the Aspen Process Economic Analyzer (APEA) and potential
scale-up-induced yield deviations, confirming the robustness of the main conclusions. The results demonstrate that the
FGDG-NH4OH-CO2 system can achieve both economic feasibility and effective CO2 mitigation, providing strategic
insights for industrial deployment under diverse market and policy conditions.

