Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received April 3, 2026
Accepted July 13, 2026
Available online November 25, 2026
-
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits
unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
All issues
Comparative Study of Dimethyl Ether (DME) Production Using CO2, Syngas, and Biogas: Economic and Environmental Perspectives
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-026-00789-x
Abstract
Fossil fuels are carbon sources that account for a significant 80% of energy supply. Electricity-based fuel (e-fuel) and
biofuel are attracting attention as technologies that produce alternative fuels to these fossil fuels. Among low-carbon ecofriendly
materials, dimethyl ether (DME) is of high interest as it can be used as both e-fuel and biofuel. In this study,
three raw materials, i.e. syngas, biogas, mix of captured CO2 and green H2, are used to compare DME fuel production
process. Furthermore, by comparing two synthesis routes, techno-economic analysis and environmental impact evaluation
are conducted for the six processes. As a result, the most eco-friendly process was the CO2 and H2-based indirect synthesis
process with 0.24 ton-CO2/ton-DME, and the most cost-competitive process was the syngas-based direct synthesis process
with 434 $/ton-DME. Meanwhile, considering the minimum DME selling price (MDSP), only CO2 and H2-based DME processes
(i.e., 1,938 $/ton-DME and 2,633 $/ton-DME for the indirect and direct route, respectively) are more expensive than
fossil fuel. However, with advances in hydrogen technology and the implementation of carbon taxes, the MDSP decreases
by about 48.7% and 50.4%, respectively, suggesting its potential as a cost-competitive alternative fuel.

