Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received March 7, 2026
Accepted May 5, 2026
Available online September 25, 2026
-
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits
unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
All issues
Thermodynamic and Cost Evaluation of Pressurized SOEC Systems Integrated with Nuclear Small Modular Reactors
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-026-00745-9
Abstract
Hydrogen production is rapidly becoming a central pillar of industrial decarbonization, yet its economic viability remains
strongly constrained by electricity price volatility and system inefficiencies. While pressurized solid oxide electrolysis cell
(SOEC) operation is often promoted as a performance enhancement strategy, its practical value at full system scale especially
under nuclear small modular reactor (SMR) heat integration has not been rigorously quantified. In this context, this
study delivers a unified cross-configuration assessment that directly compares atmospheric SOEC (Case 1), PSOEC (Case
2), and an SMR-PSOEC (Case 3) within one internally consistent thermodynamic and economic platform. By embedding
electrochemical behavior, pressure effects, nuclear heat utilization, and capital-operational cost interactions into a single
steady-state model, the present work reveals how pressure and nuclear coupling of an 80 MWₜₕ pressurized water reactor
(PWR-20) SMR reshape overall SOEC plant efficiency and cost structure. The results reveal that operation of a SOEC
yields moderate system-level efficiency gains; however, significantly higher improvements are achieved when high-grade
SMR nuclear heat integration is utilized for steam generation. This integration increases the SMR-PSOEC efficiency to
76.9 %, with a hybrid system efficiency of 50.1 % when both nuclear heat and electricity inputs are considered. Economically,
integration lowers the LCOH from 8.74 to 7.93 $/kg, highlighting the advantage of coordinated thermal-electrical
coupling. Steam utilization and heat-power split emerge as key thermodynamic drivers, while capacity factor, electricity
price, CAPEX, and taxation dominate economic sensitivity. Overall, SMR-assisted PSOEC integration presents a structurally
superior configuration for large-scale low-carbon hydrogen production.

