ISSN: 0256-1115 (print version) ISSN: 1975-7220 (electronic version)
Copyright © 2025 KICHE. All rights reserved

Articles & Issues

Language
English
Conflict of Interest
In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Publication history
Received August 25, 2024
Accepted January 5, 2025
Available online March 25, 2025
articles This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.

All issues

Advanced Distillation Technologies for Dimethyl Ether Production: A Comprehensive Techno-economic Evaluation

Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering , Universitas Indonesia , Depok 16424 , Indonesia 1Sustainable Energy Systems and Policy Research Cluster , Universitas Indonesia , Depok 16424 , Indonesia
rahmamuthia@ui.ac.id
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, March 2025, 42(3), 505-527(23)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-025-00387-3

Abstract

Dimethyl ether is a promising alternative energy source to liquefi ed petroleum gas and diesel fuel due to its cleaner combustion

properties. However, dimethyl ether production from methanol typically suff ers from intense energy consumption, high

CO 2 emissions, and large costs. Advanced distillation technologies, particularly reactive distillation (RD) and dividing-wall

column (DWC), are potentially capable of addressing such issues. The present study evaluates the techno-economic performance

of those advanced distillation technologies by accounting for a complete set of reaction and separation functions

and an identical catalyst, i.e., Amberlyst-35, for each process confi guration. The use of a common catalyst ensures that the

identifi ed performance diff erences are attributable to the technology confi gurations themselves rather than the variations in

catalyst type. The fi nding interestingly suggests that the DWC scheme outperforms both conventional reactor-distillation

and RD schemes. The specifi c energy consumptions for the conventional, RD and DWC schemes are 1.74, 4.10 and 1.41 GJ/

ton, respectively, while the CO 2 emissions for those schemes are 0.09, 0.22 and 0.08 tons CO 2 /ton, respectively. The DWC

scheme off ers the lowest total annual cost, i.e., $1,601,733/year, followed by the conventional and RD schemes, which are

$1,844,407/year and $2,585,633/year, respectively.

The Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers. F5,119, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
TEL. No. +82-2-458-3078FAX No. +82-507-804-0669E-mail : kiche@kiche.or.kr

Copyright (C) KICHE.all rights reserved.

- Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 상단으로