Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received April 15, 2025
Revised June 15, 2025
Accepted July 16, 2025
Available online October 25, 2025
-
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits
unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
All issues
Kinetic Modeling and Mechanism of the Gas Bubble-Assisted Extraction of Paclitaxel from Biomass of Taxus chinensis
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-025-00525-x
Abstract
In this study, the extraction effi ciency, extraction kinetics, and extraction mechanism according to bubble size in gas bubbleassisted
extraction were investigated to recover paclitaxel effi ciently from Taxus chinensis . When the bubble diameters were
2.3, 2.7, 3.0, 3.3, 3.7, 4.1, 4.5, 4.8, and 5.3 mm, the maximum extracted paclitaxel concentrations were 0.812, 0.830, 0.845,
0.850, 0.868, 0.876, 0.900, 0.916, and 0.933 mg/mL, respectively. The results indicated that the paclitaxel yield increased as
the bubble diameter increased during extraction. Most of the paclitaxel (> 93.3%) could be recovered by a one-time extraction
when the bubble diameters were greater than 5.3 mm. The extraction mechanism demonstrated that the bubbles collapsed at
the surface of the extraction solution and created shockwaves that strongly impacted the biomass, which disrupted the cells.
When the extracted data were applied to various empirical models (second-order model, parabolic diff usion model, power
law model, and logarithmic model), the second-order model was found to be the most suitable. In addition, a model that can
predict the concentration of extracted paclitaxel was proposed using regression analysis of the equilibrium concentration
and initial extraction rate according to the bubble diameter. The experimental data and the predicted data were found to be
in agreement.

