Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits
unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
All issues
Green Synthesis of ZnO/αFe 2 O 3 Nano-photocatalyst for Effi cient Removal of Carbamate Pesticides in Wastewater: Optimization, Mineralization, and Financial Analysis
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-024-00073-w
Abstract
As emerging organic agricultural pollutants, carbamate pesticides can react with other contaminants in aquatic environments
to produce new toxic compounds threatening aquatic life and ecosystems. This study introduces a novel, nonhazardous, and
greener method to synthesize a cross-linked ZnO/αFe 2 O 3 nano-photocatalyst to treat carbamate pesticides via ball milling.
ZnO/αFe 2 O 3 was characterized through various methods, including XRD, EDX, XRF, DRS, BET, FE-SEM, PL, and FTIR
analyses. Using the Response Surface Methodology (RSM), the ability of ZnO/αFe 2 O 3 nano-photocatalyst to remove carbamate
from synthesized wastewater was assessed. The BET result indicated a decrease in the diameter of the nanocomposite
size after the synthesis. At the same time, the BET surface area and total pores increased from 4.9871 m 2 .g −1 and 0.02806
cm 3 .g −1 to 6.8524 m 2 .g −1 and 0.069497 cm 3 .g −1 , respectively. In addition, the band-gap energy decreased from 3.179 eV for
ZnO to 1.907 eV for ZnO/αFe 2 O 3 and eventually reached 1.878 eV for heat-treated ZnO/αFe 2 O 3 nanocomposite. The catalyst
concentrations used in the experiments were 0.5, 1, and 1.5 g/L. The solution pH was set to 5, 8, and 11, and three diff erent
residence times of 1, 2, and 3 h were used. The model’s results indicated a strong agreement between the experimental and
predicted data (R 2 = 0.99). When the nanocomposite’s concentration, pH, and retention time were set at 1 g/L ZnO/αFe 2 O 3 ,
8.51, and 3 h respectively, the optimized conditions predicted a removal effi ciency of 89%. In addition, the cost of COD
removal was reduced by 50% using ball milling and heat-treatment synthesis. The photocatalyst’s reusability was tested in
three stages, and the outcomes demonstrated its stability throughout these three stages.

