ISSN: 0256-1115 (print version) ISSN: 1975-7220 (electronic version)
Copyright © 2024 KICHE. All rights reserved

Articles & Issues

Language
English
Conflict of Interest
In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Publication history
Received January 6, 2022
Accepted April 2, 2022
articles This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.

All issues

Techno-economic analysis of methanol and ammonia co-producing process using CO2 from blast furnace gas

School of Chemical Engineering, University of Ulsan, 93, Daehak-ro, Nam-gu, Ulsan 44610, Korea
jdonghwi@ulsan.ac.kr
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, August 2022, 39(8), 1999-2009(11), 10.1007/s11814-022-1129-9
downloadDownload PDF

Abstract

In steel manufacturing plants, blast furnace gas is generated from a furnace in which steel ore, coke and limestone are heated and melted. It is commonly used to produce electricity or released to the atmosphere in general; however, it can be utilized as a carbon source to produce C1 value-added chemicals. In this study, we propose two production schemes for methanol production and co-production of methanol and ammonia from blast furnace gas. Both cases were simulated using Aspen Plus V12 and economics was evaluated using Aspen Process Economic Analyzer (APEA). As a result, the methanol production case produced 99.4 wt% 232 t/day of methanol and the co-production case produced 97.7 wt%, 453.4 t/day of ammonia and 99.8 wt%, 263 t/day of methanol. The total annual cost of the methanol production case is US 121.6M$/y and US 222.1M$/y at the co-production case. The NPVs are -810.4M$ in the methanol production case and -981.3M$ in the co-production case, respectively. By sensitivity analysis, it is shown that the co-production case can be more economically feasible in the aspect of NPV when the raw material cost decreases 30%.

References

IEA, Global Energy & CO2 Status Report 2019, IEA, Paris (2019).
Rosenfeld DC, Lehner M, Renew. Energy, 147, 1511 (2020)
Liu W, Yang F, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 46, 10548 (2021)
Cavaliere P, Clean ironmaking and steelmaking processes, Springer, Lecce, Italy (2019).
Jiang K, Ashworth P, Angus D, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 119, 109601 (2020)
Leonzio G, J. CO2 Util., 27, 326 (2018)
Tamboli AH, Kim H, Chem. Eng. J., 323, 530 (2017)
Artz J, Leitner W, Chem. Rev., 118, 434 (2018)
Cuéllar-Franca RM, Azapagic A, J. CO2 Util., 9, 82 (2015)
Lee JK, Lee IB, Han J, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 75, 77 (2019)
Chen WH, Du SW, Energy, 86, 758 (2015)
Soto WU, Falk L, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 74, 809 (2017)
Zheng W, Zeng W, Fuel, 302, 121100 (2021)
GlobeNewswire, https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/ 06/25/2253193/28124/en/Global-Methanol-Market-2021-to-2026- Industry-Trends-Share-Size-Growth-Opportunity-and-Forecasts. html (2021).
Methanol institute, https://www.methanol.org/methanol-price-supply- demand/ (2021).
Lee B, Lim H, Appl. Energy, 279, 115827 (2020)
Fortes MP, Tzimas E, Appl. Energy, 161, 718 (2016)
Shin S, Lee IB, Energy, 200, 117506 (2020)
Meunier N, Weireld GD, Renew. Energy, 146, 1192 (2020)
Bermúdez JM, Menéndez JA, Fuel, 89, 2897 (2010)
Kim D, Han J, Energy, 198, 117355 (2020)
U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2019, Reston, VA, USA (2019).
Grand View Research, https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/ammonia-market (2017).
Osman O, Sleptchenko A, J. Clean Prod., 271, 121627 (2020)
Koohestanian E, Samimi A, Energy, 144, 279 (2018)
Pawar ND, Stolten D, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 46, 27247 (2021)
AspenTech®, https://lms.nchu.edu.tw/sysdata/doc/1/196bb4d4fac4 c3d7/pdf.pdf (2018).
Kalbani HA, Wang H, Appl. Energy, 165, 809 (2016)
Matzen M, Demirel Y, Energy, 93, 1 (2015)
Alarifi A, Croiset E, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 55, 1164 (2016)
Graaf GH, Stamhuis EJ, Beenackers AACM, Chem. Eng. Sci., 43, 3185 (1988)
Nyári J, Aarnio AS, J. CO2 Util., 39, 101106 (2020)
Spath PL, Dayton DC, NREL, Golden (CO, USA) (2003).
Encyclopedia Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/technology/Haber-Bosch-process (2020).
Christiansen LJ, Ammonia: Catalysis and manufacture, Springer-Verlag, Lyngby, Denmark (1995).
Lim YI, Choi J, Moon HM, Kim G, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 54, 3 (2016)
Ruthven DM, Farooq S, Knaebel KS, Pressure swing adsorption, Wiley, New York, USA (1994).
Zhang C, Kang SC, Fuel, 157, 285 (2015)
Peters MS, Timmerhaus K, West R, Plant design and economics for chemical engineers, McGraw-Hill Professional, New York, USA (2002).
Turton RA, Analysis, synthesis, and design of chemical processes, Prentice Hall, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA (2003).
Chemical engineering, https://www.chemengonline.com (2021).
Seider WD, Seader JD, Product and process design principles, Wiley, New York, USA (2010).
The Engineering ToolBox, https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/fuels-higher-calorific-values-d_169.html (2021).
METGroup, https://group.met.com/en/media/energy-insight/calorific-value-of-natural-gas (2021).
Ebrahimi A, Ziabasharhagh M, Energy, 126, 868 (2017)
Alege FP, Ndegwa PM, J. Clean Prod., 310, 127481 (2021)
Bellotti D, Magistri L, Energy Procedia, 158, 4721 (2019)
Schnitkey G, Weekly Farm Economics. 178 (2018).
Douglas JM, Conceptual design of chemical processes, McGraw- Hill New York, USA (1988).

The Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers. F5, 119, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, 233 Spring Street Seoul 02856, South Korea.
Phone No. +82-2-458-3078FAX No. +82-507-804-0669E-mail : kiche@kiche.or.kr

Copyright (C) KICHE.all rights reserved.

- Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 상단으로