Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received May 29, 2015
Accepted February 11, 2016
-
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits
unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
Treatment of biodiesel wastewater by indirect electrooxidation: Effect of additives and process kinetics
1Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, 254 Phayathai Rd., Bangkok 10330, Thailand 2Department of Chemical Technology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, 254 Phayathai Rd., Bangkok 10330, Thailand 3Center of Excellence on Petrochemical and Materials Technology (PETRO-MAT), Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
mali.h@chula.ac.th
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, July 2016, 33(7), 2090-2096(7)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-016-0045-2
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-016-0045-2
Abstract
Due to the presence of growth inhibitor and high impurity concentration in biodiesel wastewater, both biological and chemical processes are ineffective for treating such wastewater. In this work, biodiesel wastewater was treated by electrooxidation via Ti/RuO2 electrodes in batch and continuous modes. Effects of the additive type, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and sodium chloride (NaCl), and concentration on the treatment efficiency, monitored in terms of the reduction in the biological oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD) and oil and grease level, were explored. The addition of NaCl gave higher treatment efficiency than H2O2, and both were higher than no addition, due to the continuous generation of the oxidizing chloride species. The removal of almost all the COD and oil and grease and ~95% BOD was obtained in the presence of 0.061 M NaCl at an applied current density of 4.28 mA/cm2 for 7 h. In continuous operation mode, the steady state condition was reached within 11 h and the treatment efficiency decreased as the wastewater feed rate increased. By using wastewater feed rate of 2mL/min, approximately 83.56, 61.43 and 91.72% of BOD, COD and oil and grease levels were respectively removed. The rate of pollutant removal fitted a first order reaction for both the batch and continuous operation modes.
References
Polczmann G, Toth O, Beck A, Hancsok J, J. Clean Prod., 111, 85 (2009)
Daud NM, Abdullah SRS, Abu Hasan H, Yaakob Z, Process Saf. Environ. Protect., 94, 487 (2015)
Ngamlerdpokin K, Kumjadpai S, Chatanon P, Tungmanee U, Chuenchuanchom S, Jaruwat P, Lertsathitphongs P, Hunsom PM, J. Environ. Manage., 92, 2454 (2011)
Suehara K, Kawamoto Y, Fujii E, Kohda J, Nakano Y, Yano T, J. Biosci. Bioeng., 100(4), 437 (2005)
Kumjadpai S, Ngamlerdpokin K, Chatanon P, Lertsathitphongs P, Hunsom M, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 89(2), 369 (2011)
Daud Z, Awang H, Latif AAA, Nasir N, Ridzuan MB, Ahmad Z, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 2407 (2015)
Rattanapan C, Sawain A, Suksaroj T, Suksaroj C, Desalination, 280(1-3), 370 (2011)
De Gisi S, Galasso M, De Feo G, Environ. Technol., 34(5-8), 861 (2013)
Pitakpoolsil W, Hunsom M, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 44, 963 (2013)
Pitakpoolsil W, Hunsom M, J. Environ. Manage., 133, 284 (2014)
Martinez-Huitle CA, Rodrigo MA, Sires I, Scialdone O, Chem. Rev., 115(24), 13362 (2015)
Brillas E, Martinez-Huitle CA, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 166-167, 603 (2015)
Martinez-Huitle CA, Brillas E, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 87(3-4), 105 (2009)
de Almeida CC, da Costa PRF, de Macedo Melo MJ, dos Santos EV, Martinez-Huitle CA, J. Mexican Chem. Soc., 58(3), 576 (2014)
Chawaloesphosiya N, Mongkolnauwarat J, Prommajun C, Wongwailikhit K, Painmanakulm P, Environ. Eng. Res., 20(4), 392 (2015)
Piya-areetham P, Shenchunthichai K, Hunsom M, Water Res., 40(15), 2857 (2006)
Khansorthong S, Hunsom M, Chem. Eng. J., 151(1-3), 228 (2009)
Chavalparit O, Ongwandee M, J. Environ. Sci., 21, 1491 (2009)
Srirangsan A, Ongwandee M, Chavalparit O, Environ. Asia, 2, 15 (2009)
Jaruwat P, Kongjao S, Hunsom M, Energy Conv. Manag., 51(3), 531 (2010)
Romero JAP, Cardoso FSS, Figueiredo RT, Silva DP, Cavalcanti EB, Sep. Sci. Technol., 48(13), 2073 (2013)
APHA, AWWA, WEF. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th Ed. (1998).
Sarkka H, Bhatnagar A, Sillanpaa M, J. Electroanal. Chem., 754, 46 (2015)
Mohan N, Balasubramanian N, Basha CA, J. Hazard. Mater., 147(1-2), 644 (2007)
Raghu S, Basha CA, J. Hazard. Mater., 139(2), 381 (2007)
Rajkumar D, Kim JG, Palanivelu K, Chem. Eng. Technol., 28(1), 98 (2005)
Zhang Q, Kang B, Xu H, Lin H, Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 22(3), 360 (2006)
Kohen R, Nyska A, Toxicologic Pathology, 30(6), 620 (2002)
Stephanopoulos G, Chemical process control: An introduction to theory and Practices, Prentice Hall (1984).
Daud NM, Abdullah SRS, Abu Hasan H, Yaakob Z, Process Saf. Environ. Protect., 94, 487 (2015)
Ngamlerdpokin K, Kumjadpai S, Chatanon P, Tungmanee U, Chuenchuanchom S, Jaruwat P, Lertsathitphongs P, Hunsom PM, J. Environ. Manage., 92, 2454 (2011)
Suehara K, Kawamoto Y, Fujii E, Kohda J, Nakano Y, Yano T, J. Biosci. Bioeng., 100(4), 437 (2005)
Kumjadpai S, Ngamlerdpokin K, Chatanon P, Lertsathitphongs P, Hunsom M, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 89(2), 369 (2011)
Daud Z, Awang H, Latif AAA, Nasir N, Ridzuan MB, Ahmad Z, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 2407 (2015)
Rattanapan C, Sawain A, Suksaroj T, Suksaroj C, Desalination, 280(1-3), 370 (2011)
De Gisi S, Galasso M, De Feo G, Environ. Technol., 34(5-8), 861 (2013)
Pitakpoolsil W, Hunsom M, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 44, 963 (2013)
Pitakpoolsil W, Hunsom M, J. Environ. Manage., 133, 284 (2014)
Martinez-Huitle CA, Rodrigo MA, Sires I, Scialdone O, Chem. Rev., 115(24), 13362 (2015)
Brillas E, Martinez-Huitle CA, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 166-167, 603 (2015)
Martinez-Huitle CA, Brillas E, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 87(3-4), 105 (2009)
de Almeida CC, da Costa PRF, de Macedo Melo MJ, dos Santos EV, Martinez-Huitle CA, J. Mexican Chem. Soc., 58(3), 576 (2014)
Chawaloesphosiya N, Mongkolnauwarat J, Prommajun C, Wongwailikhit K, Painmanakulm P, Environ. Eng. Res., 20(4), 392 (2015)
Piya-areetham P, Shenchunthichai K, Hunsom M, Water Res., 40(15), 2857 (2006)
Khansorthong S, Hunsom M, Chem. Eng. J., 151(1-3), 228 (2009)
Chavalparit O, Ongwandee M, J. Environ. Sci., 21, 1491 (2009)
Srirangsan A, Ongwandee M, Chavalparit O, Environ. Asia, 2, 15 (2009)
Jaruwat P, Kongjao S, Hunsom M, Energy Conv. Manag., 51(3), 531 (2010)
Romero JAP, Cardoso FSS, Figueiredo RT, Silva DP, Cavalcanti EB, Sep. Sci. Technol., 48(13), 2073 (2013)
APHA, AWWA, WEF. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th Ed. (1998).
Sarkka H, Bhatnagar A, Sillanpaa M, J. Electroanal. Chem., 754, 46 (2015)
Mohan N, Balasubramanian N, Basha CA, J. Hazard. Mater., 147(1-2), 644 (2007)
Raghu S, Basha CA, J. Hazard. Mater., 139(2), 381 (2007)
Rajkumar D, Kim JG, Palanivelu K, Chem. Eng. Technol., 28(1), 98 (2005)
Zhang Q, Kang B, Xu H, Lin H, Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 22(3), 360 (2006)
Kohen R, Nyska A, Toxicologic Pathology, 30(6), 620 (2002)
Stephanopoulos G, Chemical process control: An introduction to theory and Practices, Prentice Hall (1984).

