Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received July 4, 2011
Accepted October 6, 2011
- This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
Waste coffee-grounds as potential biosorbents for removal of acid dye 44 from aqueous solution
Department of Chemical Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 139-701, Korea 1Department of Chemistry, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat 123, Oman 2Department of Chemical System Technology, Keimyung University, Daegu 704-701, Korea
korea1@kw.ac.kr
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, July 2012, 29(7), 903-907(5), 10.1007/s11814-011-0260-9
Download PDF
Abstract
Waste coffee-grounds (CG) with micro- and macropores are a potential biosorbent for the removal of organics or heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions. In several studies, CG was used as adsorbent for removal of heavy metal ions and organics (phenolic compounds). We investigated the potential application of CG as biosorbents for the removal of acid dye (Acid Red 44). To evaluate objectively the adsorption performance of the CG, conventional adsorbent (DA, Degussa alumina) was also tested and our previous reported data for mesoporous materials compared. In adsorption kinetics, experimental data followed the pseudo-second-order kinetic model and intraparticle diffusion was rate-controlled. The maximum uptake (Qm) capacity of CG proved half of DA, but its adsorption rate was fast (less than 1 h). Namely, Qm of CG is 27.8mg/g, and smaller than that of mesoporous adsorbents. However, coffee-ground biosorbent_x000D_
still possesses economical advantages compared to inorganic adsorbents.
References
Bhatnagar A, Minocha AK, Indian J. Chem. Technol., 13, 203 (2006)
Utomo HD, Hunter KA, J. Surf. Sic. Nanotech., 4, 504 (2006)
Ahmad MA, Rahman NK, Chem. Eng. J., 170(1), 154 (2011)
Boonamnuayvitaya V, Chaiya CY, Tanthapanichakoon W, Jarudilokkul S, Sep. Purif. Technol., 35(1), 11 (2004)
Franca AS, Oliveira LS, Ferreira ME, Desalination, 249(1), 267 (2009)
Lee B, Kim Y, Lee H, Yi J, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., 50, 77 (2001)
Kim Y, Kim C, Choi I, Rengaraj S, Yi J, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 924 (2004)
Forgacs E, Cserhati T, Oros G, Environ. Inter., 30, 953 (2004)
Andreozzi R, Caprio V, Insola A, Marotta R, Catal. Today, 53(1), 51 (1999)
Kim Y, Kim C, Yi J, Mater. Res. Bull., 39, 2103 (2004)
Park JC, Joo JB, Yi J, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 22(2), 276 (2005)
Ho YS, McKay G, Water Res., 34, 735 (2000)
Weber WJ, Morris JC, Advances in water pollution research, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1964)
Oliveira LS, Franca AS, Alves TM, Rocha SDF, J. Hazard. Mater., 155(3), 507 (2008)
Seader JD, Henley EJ, Separation process principles, John Wiley, New York (1998)
Utomo HD, Hunter KA, J. Surf. Sic. Nanotech., 4, 504 (2006)
Ahmad MA, Rahman NK, Chem. Eng. J., 170(1), 154 (2011)
Boonamnuayvitaya V, Chaiya CY, Tanthapanichakoon W, Jarudilokkul S, Sep. Purif. Technol., 35(1), 11 (2004)
Franca AS, Oliveira LS, Ferreira ME, Desalination, 249(1), 267 (2009)
Lee B, Kim Y, Lee H, Yi J, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., 50, 77 (2001)
Kim Y, Kim C, Choi I, Rengaraj S, Yi J, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 924 (2004)
Forgacs E, Cserhati T, Oros G, Environ. Inter., 30, 953 (2004)
Andreozzi R, Caprio V, Insola A, Marotta R, Catal. Today, 53(1), 51 (1999)
Kim Y, Kim C, Yi J, Mater. Res. Bull., 39, 2103 (2004)
Park JC, Joo JB, Yi J, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 22(2), 276 (2005)
Ho YS, McKay G, Water Res., 34, 735 (2000)
Weber WJ, Morris JC, Advances in water pollution research, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1964)
Oliveira LS, Franca AS, Alves TM, Rocha SDF, J. Hazard. Mater., 155(3), 507 (2008)
Seader JD, Henley EJ, Separation process principles, John Wiley, New York (1998)