In the same way as in other processes, the simulation of the distillation of wine and must is a challenging task due to of the lack of thermodynamic information because of scarcity of accurate studies of phase equilibria. Simulation of these processes is rather complicated because of the presence of polar substances (called congeners) at very low concentration. These congeners are essential enological components of the organoleptic matrix, so the availability of accurate studies and quality data is of primary interest. This work studies the phase behaviour of the ternary system ethanol+water+1-pentanol at 101.3 kPa, being the third compound one of the most important legal congeners in common alcoholic distillation. Experimental results showed that this system is partially miscible and exhibits two binary minimum azeotropes. Prediction of activity coefficients and equilibrium compositions with different UNIFAC group contribution models showed poor accurate results. Consistency of experimental data was tested by the McDermott- Ellis method. In addition, available literature was compared and commented upon. The lack of experimental data in multicomponent alcoholic distillation mixtures and the low reliability of the group contribution methods suggest a prudent work into simulation of this kind of distillation processes.

Phase Equilibria Prediction Azeotrope Ethanol Water 1-Pentanol Thermodynamic Topological Analysis

Abrams DS, Prausnitz JM, AIChE J., 21, 116 (1975) 
Daubert TE, Danner RP, Physical and thermodynamic properties of pure chemicals. Data compilation, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York (1986)
Faundez CA, Alvarez VH, Valderrama JO, Ingenieria Quimica., 25, 40 (2004)
Faundez CA, Alvarez VH, Valderrama JO, J. Phase Equilib. Diff., 25(3), 203 (2004)
Fernandez MJ, Gomis V, Loras S, Ruiz F, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 46, 665 (2001) 
Fernandez-Garcia T, Martin ME, Casp A, Z Lebensm Unters Forsch A, 206, 414 (1998) 
Foucher ER, Doherty MF, Malone MF, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 30, 760 (1991) 
Fredenslund A, Gmehling J, Rasmussen P, Vapor-liquid equilibria using UNIFAC, a group contribution method, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1977)
Gmehling J, Onken U, Vapor-liquid equilibrium data collection, Chemistry Data, Series, DECHEMA, Frankfurt/Main (1977)
Hayden JG, O’Connell JP, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 14, 209 (1975) 
Hikari A, Kubo R, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 8(4), 294 (1975)
Laroche L, Bekiaris N, Andersen HW, Morari M, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 69, 1302 (1991)
Larsen BL, Rasmussen P, Fredenslund A, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 26, 2274 (1987) 
Lora J, Iborra MI, Perez R, Carbonell I, I. Revista Espanola de Ciencia y Tecnologia de Alimentos., 32(6), 621 (1992)
Matsuyama H, Nishimura H, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 10(3), 181 (1977)
McDermott C, Ellis SRM, Chem. Eng. Sci., 20, 293 (1965) 
Poling BE, Prausnitz JM, O’Connell JP, The properties of gases and liquids, McGraw-Hill, New York (2001)
Prausnitz J, Anderson T, Greens E, Eckert C, Hsieh R, O’Connell J, Computer calculations for multicomponent vapor-liquid and liquid-liquid equilibria, Prentice-Hall, INC., New Jersey (1980)
Resa JM, Gonzalez C, Goenaga JM, Iglesias MJ, Chem. Eng. Data, 49, 804 (2004) 
Resa JM, Gonzalez C, Goenaga JM, Iglesias MJ, Sol. Chem., 33(2), 169 (2004) 
Riddick JA, Bunger WB, Sakano TK, Organic solvents, Physical properties and methods of purification, 4th ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York (1986)
Selli S, Cabaroglu T, Canbas A, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 38, 587 (2003) 
Tamir A, Wisniak J, Chem. Eng. Sci., 33, 657 (1978) 
Tourino A, Casas LM, Marino G, Iglesias M, Orge B, Tojo J, Fluid Phase Equilib., 206(1-2), 61 (2003) 
Widagdo S, Seider WD, AIChE J., 42(1), 96 (1996) 
Wisniak J, Tamir AJ, Chem. Eng. Data, 22, 253 (1977) 
Yen LC, Woods SS, AIChE J., 12, 95 (1966)