Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
-
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits
unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
Prediction of Equilibrium Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Aqueous 2-Amino-2-methyl-1,3-propanediol Solutions
Power Generation Research Laboratory, Korea Electric Power Research Institute, 103-16 Munji-dong, Yusong-ku, Taejon 305-380, Korea
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, July 2000, 17(4), 484-487(4), 10.1007/BF02706866
Download PDF
Abstract
The modified Kent-Eisenberg model was used to predict the solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous 2-amino-2-methyl-1,3-propanediol (AMPO) solutions over a wide range of solvent concentration (10-30 mass %), temperature of (30-60℃), and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (5-1,100 kPa). For more accurate prediction, a new set of experimental data of this system was also presented and used in model calculation. The predicted results by the modified Kent-Eisenberg model were found to be in good agreement with the experimental data. The equilibrium constant, K1, which represented the deprotonation reaction of AMPD, was expressed as a function of not only temperature but also loading capacity and amine concentration.
References
Austgen DM, Rochelle GT, Chen CC, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 30, 543 (1991)
Baek JI, Yoon JH, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 43(4), 635 (1998)
Chakma A, Meisen A, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 26, 2461 (1987)
Deshmukh RD, Mather AE, Chem. Eng. Sci., 36, 355 (1981)
Hu W, Chakma A, Chem. Eng. Commun., 94, 53 (1990)
Isaacs EE, Otto FD, Mather AE, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 25, 118 (1980)
Jou FY, Mather AE, Otto FD, Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev., 21, 539 (1982)
Jou FY, Mather AE, Otto FD, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 73(1), 140 (1995)
Jou FY, Otto FD, Mather AE, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 33(8), 2002 (1994)
Kent RL, Eisenberg B, Hydrocarb. Process., 55, 87 (1976)
Li MH, Chang BC, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 39(3), 448 (1994)
Li MH, Shen KP, Fluid Phase Equilib., 85, 129 (1993)
Satori G, Savage DW, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 22, 239 (1983)
Seo DJ, Hong WH, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 41(2), 258 (1996)
Tontiwachwuthikul P, Meisen A, Lim CJ, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 36, 130 (1991)
Yih SM, Shen KP, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 27, 2237 (1988)
Baek JI, Yoon JH, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 43(4), 635 (1998)
Chakma A, Meisen A, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 26, 2461 (1987)
Deshmukh RD, Mather AE, Chem. Eng. Sci., 36, 355 (1981)
Hu W, Chakma A, Chem. Eng. Commun., 94, 53 (1990)
Isaacs EE, Otto FD, Mather AE, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 25, 118 (1980)
Jou FY, Mather AE, Otto FD, Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev., 21, 539 (1982)
Jou FY, Mather AE, Otto FD, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 73(1), 140 (1995)
Jou FY, Otto FD, Mather AE, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 33(8), 2002 (1994)
Kent RL, Eisenberg B, Hydrocarb. Process., 55, 87 (1976)
Li MH, Chang BC, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 39(3), 448 (1994)
Li MH, Shen KP, Fluid Phase Equilib., 85, 129 (1993)
Satori G, Savage DW, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 22, 239 (1983)
Seo DJ, Hong WH, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 41(2), 258 (1996)
Tontiwachwuthikul P, Meisen A, Lim CJ, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 36, 130 (1991)
Yih SM, Shen KP, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 27, 2237 (1988)
