Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.25, No.4, 681-692, 2008
Determination of yield distribution in olefin production by thermal cracking of atmospheric gasoil
A pilot plant was designed and set up to study the thermal cracking of atmospheric gasoil. Based on the CCD (central composite design) method, a set of systematic experiments were designed and carried out. The designed variables were COT (coil outlet temperature), steam ratio and feed flow rate. The ranges of these variables were, respectively, equal to 716-884 oC, 0.46-1.136 and 0.977-6.02 g/min. The obtained minimum and maximum yield of ethylene was, respectively, equal to 1.7% and 30.9%, as well as the maximum yield of propylene was 12.2%. To predict the yield distribution of products and the coke formation in the range of operating conditions, a mechanistic model was developed based on experimental results. To analyze and characterize the atmospheric gasoil, a novel algorithm was applied. This algorithm utilized density, ASTM distillation curve, H/C ratio and the total aromatic fraction and generates the detail analysis of feedstock including paraffinic, naphthenic, aromatics and poly aromatic compounds.
[References]
  1. Niaei A, Towfighi J, Sadreameli SM, Karimzadeh R, Appl. Therm. Eng., 24, 2251, 2004
  2. Sadreameli SM, Green AES, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 73, 305, 2005
  3. Masoumi ME, Sadreameli SM, Towfighi J, Niaei A, Energy, 31, 516, 2006
  4. Grace Chan KY, Inal F, Senkan S, I & EC Research, 37, 1998
  5. Manafzadeh H, Sadreameli SM, Towfighi J, Appl. Therm. Eng., 23, 1347, 2003
  6. Zdonik SB, Hayward GL, Fishtine SH, Hydrocarb. Process., December, 1975
  7. Kaiser V, Gilbourne D, Pocini CA, Hydrocarb. Process., April, 1977
  8. Hirato M, Yoshioka S, Matanuska, Hitachi Rev., 20(8), 326, 1971
  9. Hirato M, Yoshioka S, International Chemical Engineering, 13, 347, 1973
  10. Depeyre D, Flicoteaus C, Arabzadeh F, Zabaniotou A, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 28(7), 1989
  11. Clymans PJ, Froment GF, Berthelin M, Trambouze P, AIChE J., 30(6), 904, 1988
  12. Ranzi E, Faravelli T, Gaffuri P, Garavaglia E, Goldaniga A, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 36(8), 3336, 1997
  13. Ranzi E, Dente M, Goldaniga A, Bozzano G, Faravelli T, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 27, 99, 2001
  14. Gwyn JE, Fuel Process. Technol., 70(1), 1, 2001
  15. Shubo F, Liming S, Qiangkun L, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 65, 301, 2002
  16. Albright LF, Crynes BL, Corcoran WH, Pyrolysis: Theory and industrial practice, Academic Press, 1983
  17. Dente M, Ranzi E, Bozzano G, Faravelli T, Valkenburg PJM, Heavy component description in the kinetic modeling of hydrocarbon pyrolysis, AIChE Spring National Meeting, April 23, 2001
  18. Taskar U, Riggs JB, AIChE J., 43(3), 740, 1997
  19. Abghari SZ, Mohaddecy SS, Sedighi S, Bonyad H, Proceeding of 10th Iranian chemical engineering conference, 3372, 2005
  20. Riazi MR, Daubert TE, Hydrocarbon processing, 115, 1980
  21. Towfighi J, Niaei A, Karimzadeh R, Saedi G, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 23, 816, 2006
  22. Sundaram KM, Froment GF, Chem. Eng. Sci., 32, 601, 1977
  23. Zou R, Fundamentals of pyrolysis in petrochemistry and technology, Lewis Pub, 1993
  24. Box GEP, Draper NR, Empirical model-building and response surfaces, John Wiley & Sons, 1987
  25. Gerold CF, Wheatley PO, Applied numerical analysis, Addison-Wesley publishing company, 1984