Search / Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
Korean Chemical Engineering Research,
Vol.48, No.1, 75-79, 2010
유기 첨가제 및 NH4Cl 융제를 함유하는 분무용액으로부터 합성된 BaMgAl10O17:Eu 형광체의 특성
Characteristics of BaMgAl10O17:Eu Phosphor Powders Prepared from Spray Solution with Organic Additives and NH4Cl Flux
에틸렌디아민테트라아세트산, 구연산 및 NH4Cl 융제가 첨가된 분무용액으로부터 분무열분해법에 의해 얇은 막 구조의 전구체 분말들을 합성하였다. 1,200 ℃에서 소성 과정을 거친 유기 첨가제와 융제를 사용하지 않은 BaMgAl10O17:Eu 형광체는 1~5 μm 크기의 구형이며, 두꺼운 막 형태의 속이 빈 구조를 가졌다. 반면에 에틸렌디아민아세트산과 구연산을 첨가하여 합성된 BAM:Eu 형광체는 판상 구조의 미세한 크기를 가졌다. NH4Cl 융제의 첨가량이 0, 6, 35 wt%일때 합성된 미세 형광체들의 결정자 크기는 각각 23, 35, 33 nm였다. 최대의 발광 세기를 나타내는 최적의 융제 첨가량은 형광체의 35 wt%였으며, 융제를 첨가하지 않은 분무용액으로부터 합성된 형광체의 발광 세기의 215%였다.
The precursor powders with thin wall structure were prepared by spray pyrolysis from the spray solution with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, citric acid and NH4Cl flux. The BaMgAl10O17:Eu phosphor powders formed from the spray solution without organic additives and flux material had sizes of 1~5 μm and hollow structure with high thickness at post-treatment temperature of 1,200 ℃. However, BaMgAl10O17:Eu phosphor powders formed from the spray solution with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, citric acid and NH4Cl flux had fine size and plate-like shape. The mean crystallite sizes of the phosphor powders with fine sizes were 23, 35, and 33 nm when the content of NH4Cl flux were 0, 6, 35 wt% of phosphor. The photoluminescence intensity of the phosphor powders formed from the spray solution with the optimum amount of NH4Cl flux as 35 wt% was 215% of that of the phosphor powders formed from the spray solution without flux material.
[References]
  1. Oshio S, Kitamura K, Shigeta T, Horii S, Matsuoka T, Tanaka S, Kobayashi H, J. Electrochem. Soc., 146(1), 392, 1999
  2. Kim KB, Koo KW, Cho TY, Chun HG, Mater. Chem. Phys., 80(3), 682, 2003
  3. Deng C, Zhuang W, He D, Wang Y, Kang K, Huang X, Physica B, 344, 470, 2004
  4. Ronda CR, J. Lumin., 72, 49, 1997
  5. Li JG, Ikegami T, Lee JH, Mori T, Yajima Y, J. Europ. Ceram. Soc., 20, 2395, 2000
  6. Li X, Liu H, Wang J, Zhang X, Cui H, Opt. Mater., 25, 407, 2004
  7. Lu CH, Hsu WT, Dhanaraj J, Jagannathan R, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 24, 3723, 2004
  8. Wang J, Xu Y, Hojamberdiev M, Peng J, Zhu G, Mater. Sci. Eng. B, 156, 42, 2009
  9. Zhai Y, Yao Z, Ding S, Qiu M, Zhai J, Mater. Lett., 57, 2901, 2003
  10. Nakamura A, Nambu N, Kawahara K, Ohshio S, Saitoh H, J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn., 111, 142, 2003
  11. Zhang C, Jiang W, Yang X, Han Q, Hao Q, Wang X, J. Alloy. Compd., 474, 287, 2009
  12. Lee KK, Jung KY, Kim JH, Koo HY, Ju SH, Kang YC, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 43(4), 517, 2005
  13. Kim DY, Ju SH, Koo HY, Hong SK, Kang YC, J. Alloy. Compd., 417, 254, 2006
  14. Lee KK, Kang YC, Jung KY, Kim JH, J. Alloy. Compd., 396, 280, 2005
  15. Jung DS, Koo HY, Lee SH, Kang YC, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 46(6), 1075, 2008
  16. Lee DY, Kang YC, Park HD, Ryu SK, J. Alloy. Compd., 353, 252, 2003
  17. Lee SH, Koo HY, Jung DS, Yi JH, Kang YC, Ceram. Inter., 35, 2651, 2009