Issue
Korean Chemical Engineering Research,
Vol.49, No.2, 200-205, 2011
파일럿규모 슬러리 기포탑에서 기포체류량의 축방향, 반경방향 분포
Axial and Radial Distributions of Bubble Holdup in a Slurry Bubble Column with Pilot Plant Scale
직경 1.0 m인 파일럿 규모 슬러리 기포탑에서 기포체류량의 축방향, 반경방향분포를 고찰하였다. 기체의 유속, 연속 액상의 표면장력 그리고 슬러리상에 포함된 고체입자의 분율이 기포탑 내부 기포의 축방향 및 반경방향 분포에 미치는 영향을 검토하였다. 본 연구의 실험조건 모두에서 체류량은 기포탑의 중심으로부터 반경방향 무차원 거리가 증가함에 따라 감소하였으며, 기포탑의 분산판으로부터 축방향의 무차원의 거리가 증가함에 따라 증가하였다. 기포체류량의 반경방향 불균일도는 기체의 유속이 증가함에 따라 연속 액상의 표면장력이 감소함에 따라 증가하였으나 슬러리상에 포함된 고체입자 분율에는 크게 영향을 받지 않았다. 본 연구의 범위에서 축방향과 반경방향 기포체류량의 분포는 각각의 실험변수의 상관식으로 나타낼 수 있었다.
Axial and radial distributions of bubble holdup were investigated in a slurry bubble column with pilot plant scale(D=1.0 m). Effects of gas velocity, surface tension of continuous liquid medium and solid fraction in the slurry phase on the axial and radial distributions of bubble holdup were examined. The bubble holdup decreased with increasing radial dimensionless distance from the center of the column, while it increased with increasing dimensionless distance in the axial direction from the distributor, in all the cases studied. The radial non-uniformity of bubble holdup increased with increasing gas velocity but decreasing surface tension of liquid medium, while it was not dependent upon the solid fraction in the slurry phase. The axial non-uniformity of bubble holdup increased with increasing gas velocity, but it does not change considerably with variations of liquid surface tension or solid fraction in the slurry phase . The axial and radial distributions of bubble holdup were well correlated in terms of operating variables within this experiexperimental conditions.
[References]
  1. Deckwer WD, Bubble column Reactors, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 1992
  2. Nigam KDP, Schumpe A, “Three-phase Spagered Reactors," Gorden and Breach, 1996
  3. Mills PL, Chaudhari RV, Catal. Today, “Reaction Engineering of Emerging Oxidation Process,”, 48(1-4), 17, 1999
  4. Pinta A, Levec J, Chem. Eng. Sci., “Catalytic Liquid-Phase Oxidation of Refractory Organics in Waste Water.", 47, 2395, 1992
  5. Seo MJ, Lim DH, Shin IS, Son SM, Kang Y, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., “Mass Transfer Characteristics in Pressurized Three-phase Slurry bubble columns with Variation of column Diameter.", 47(4), 459, 2009
  6. Jang JH, Seo MJ, Lim DH, Kang Y, Jung H, Lee HT, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., “Heat Transfer Model and Energy Dissipation Rate in Bubble columns with Continuous Operation,”, 47(5), 587, 2009
  7. Seo MJ, Lim DH, Jin HR, Kang Y, Jung H, Lee HT, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., “Analysis of Hydrodynamics Similarity of Pressurized Threephase Slurry bubble column for its Design and Scale-up,”, 47(6), 720, 2009
  8. Kang Y, Lee IK, Shin IS, Son SM, Kim SD, Jung H, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., “Characteristics of Hydrodynamics, Heat and Mass Transfer in Three-phase Inverse Fluidized Beds,", 46(3), 451, 2008
  9. Kim SD, Kang Y, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., “Hydrodynamics, Heat and Mass Transfer in Inverse and Circulating Three-phase Fluidized-Bed Reactors for Waste water Treatment.", 159, 103, 2006
  10. Son SM, Song PS, Lee CG, Kang SH, Kang Y, Kusakabe K, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., “Bubble Behavior in Gas-liquid Counter Current Bubble Column Bioreactor.", 37(8), 990, 2004
  11. Son SM, Yun JH, Kim HT, Song PS, Kang Y, Kim SD, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., “Axial Variation and Distribution of Bubble Properties in Gas/liquid Countercurrent Fluidized Beds.", 42(2), 235, 2004
  12. Son SM, Kang SH, Kim UY, Kang Y, Kim SD, Chem. Eng. Process., “Bubble Properties in Three-phase Inverse Fluidized Beds with Viscous Liquid Medium,”, 46(8), 736, 2007
  13. Lee KI, Son SM, Kim UY, Kang Y, Kang SH, Kim SD, Lee JK, Seo YC, Kim WH, Chem. Eng. Sci., “Particle Dispersion in Viscous Three-phase Inverse Fluidized Beds,”, 62(24), 7060, 2007
  14. Chen J, Gupta P, Degleesan S, Al-Dahhan MH, Dudukovic MP, Toseland BA, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation., “Gas holdup Distibutions in Large-Diameter Bubble Columns Measured by Computed Tomography.", 9, 91, 1998
  15. Ueyama K, Morooka S, Kolde K, Kaji H, Mlyauchi T, Ind. Eng. Process Des. Dev., “Behavior of Gas Bubbles in Bubble Columns,”, 19, 592, 1980
  16. Jin HB, Yang SH, Guo ZW, He GX, Tong ZM, Chem. Eng. J., “The Axial Distribution of Holdups in an Industrial-Scale Bubble column with Evaluated Pressure Using -ray Attenuation Approach,”, 115(1-2), 45, 2005
  17. Krishna R, Sie ST, Fuel Process. Technol., “Design and Scale-up of the Fischer-Tropsh Bubble Column Slurry Reactor,”, 64(1-3), 73, 2000
  18. Neathery JK, Davis BH, Catal. Today, “FT Catalyst Performance: Comparison “FT Catalyst Performance: Comparison.", 84(1-2), 3, 2003