About The Journal
  Aims and Scope
  Editorial Board
  Submit a Manuscript 
  Subscription Information
Articles & Issues
  Issue
  Search
For Authors
  Instructions to Authors
  Ethics in Publishing
  Peer Review Process
  Author's Checklist
  Copyright Transfer Form
Contact us
 
 
 
 
Issue
Korean Chemical Engineering Research,
Vol.59, No.3, 410-416, 2021
건식 스피드 믹서를 이용한 PFO 피치 코팅 천연 흑연의 전기화학적 성능
Electrochemical Performance of PFO Pitch coated Natural Graphite using Dry Speed Mixer
윤재웅, 이종대
본 연구에서는 천연 흑연의 용량과 안정성을 개선하기 위해 석유계 피치로 코팅된 천연 흑연을 제조하여 전기화학적 성능을 평가하였다. 천연흑연과 피치를 건식 스피드 믹서를 이용해 코팅하였으며, 믹서의 회전 속도, 시간, 흑연과 피치의 조성, 피치의 연화점을 변화시키면서 음극 활물질을 제조하였다. 제조된 음극 활물질의 물리적 특성은 SEM, TEM, PSD를 이용해 분석하였으며, 전기화학적 성능은 사이클, 율속, 임피던스, 순환전압 전류 테스트를 통해 조사하였다. 9000 RPM, 10 wt%, 2 h, 연화점 150 °C조건에서 코팅된 천연 흑연을 0.1 C에서 전기화학적 특성을 테스트 하였을 때, 324.5 mAh/g 의 가장 높은 용량과 50 사이클 이후 98.9%의 용량 유지율을 보였다. 고속 충·방전을 위한 테스트에서는 5 C/0.1 C 용량 유지율은 80.3%로 나타났으며, 코팅되지 않은 천연흑연보다 약 1.7 배로 향상된 용량 유지율을 확인할 수 있었다.
To improve the capacity and stability of natural graphite, the electrochemical performances were investigated by using the prepared natural graphite coated with petroleum pitch for anode materials. The pitch coated natural graphite was prepared using a dry speed mixer by adjusting the rotation speed of the mixer, time, composition of graphite and softening point of the pitch. The physical properties of the anode material were analyzed using SEM, TEM, and PSD. The electrochemical performances were investigated by cycle, C-rate, EIS and CV test. When the pitch coated natural graphite was tested in the condition of 9000 RPM, 10 wt%, 2 h, and softening point of 150 °C, it showed the highest capacity of 324.5 mAh/g at 0.1 C and a capacity retention rate of 98.9% after 50 cycles. In the test for evaluating rate performance, the capacity retention rate (5 C/0.1 C) was 80.3% and was improved by about 1.7 times over the pristine natural graphite.
Keywords: PFO Pitch; Graphite; Dry Coating; Speed Mixer; LIB
[References]
  1. Liang G, Qin X, Zhou J, Luo L, Wang Y, Wu M, Zhu H, Chen G, Kang F, Li B, Carbon, 127, 424, 2018
  2. Kawamoto M, He P, Ito Y, Adv. Mater., 29, 160242, 2017
  3. Park Y, Hong YK, Lee K, J. Ceram. Process. Res., 18(7), 488, 2017
  4. Lee ML, Li YH, Liao SC, Chen JM, Yeh JW, Shih HC, Electrochim. Acta, 112, 529, 2013
  5. Peled E, Golodnitsky D, Menachem C, Bar-Tow D, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1445, 3482, 1998
  6. Park DY, Park DY, Lan Y, Lim YS, Kim MS, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 15, 588, 2009
  7. Jo YJ, Lee JD, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 57(1), 5, 2019
  8. Yoon S, Kim H, Oh SM, J. Power Sources, 94(1), 68, 2001
  9. Wang C, Zhao H, Wang J, Wang J, Lv P, Solid State Ion., 19, 221, 2013
  10. Wan CY, Li H, Wu MC, Zhao CJ, J. Appl. Electrochem., 39(7), 1081, 2009
  11. Kim JH, XIao CF, Go K, Lee KJ, Kim HS, Korean Inst. Electr. Electron. Mater. Eng., 32(6), 437, 2019
  12. Canakci A, Varol T, Cuvalci H, Erdemir F, Ozkaya S, Yalcın ED, Micro Nano Lett., 9(2), 109, 2014
  13. Lijia C, Haibin C, Rongyong LI, Weifeng HE, Yuhui Y, Materials Science (2021).
  14. Kim KH, Lee SM, An DH, Lee YS, Appl. Chem. Eng., 28(4), 432, 2017
  15. Dominko R, Bele M, Gaberscek M, Remskar M, Hanzel D, Pejovnik S, Jamnik J, ECS J Solid State Sci Technol, 152(3), A607, 2005
  16. Wan C, Li H, Wu M, Zhao C, J. Appl. Electrochem., 39(7), 1081, 2008
  17. Kim KS, Kim JH, Hwang JU, Im JS, Lee JD, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 30(3), 331, 2019
  18. Park DY, Park DY, Lan Y, Lim YS, Kim MS, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 15(4), 588, 2009
  19. Yang Y, Wang Z, Zhou Y, Guo H, Li X, Materials Lett., 199, 84, 2017
  20. Wang HY, Yoshio M, J. Power Sources, 93(1-2), 123, 2001
참고문헌정보(참고문헌, 인용문헌)는 화학공학소재연구정보센터에 의해 제공되고 있습니다.