Issue
Korean Chemical Engineering Research,
Vol.56, No.5, 641-646, 2018
활성탄 담지 Co-B/C, Co-P-B/C 촉매를 이용한 NaBH4 가수분해 반응
Hydrolysis Reaction of NaBH4 Using Activated Cabon Supported Co-B/C, Co-P-B/C Catalyst
휴대용 고분자전해질 연료전지의 수소발생용으로써 NaBH4는 많은 장점을 갖고 있다. 본 연구에서는 활성탄 담지Co-B/C, Co-P-B/C 촉매의 NaBH4 가수분해 특성에 대해 연구하였다. 촉매의 BET 표면적, 수소 수율, NaBH4 농도 영향, 촉매 내구성 등을 실험하였다. 활성탄에 담지시킴으로써 BET 면적이 비담지 촉매에 비해 2~3배 증가해 500 m2/g이상이 되었다. 활성탄 담지 촉매의 수소발생이 비담지 촉매보다 더 안정적이었다. 20 wt% NaBH4에서 활성화 에너지가 59.4 kJ/mol로 Co-P-B/FeCrAlloy 촉매 보다 14% 낮았다. 활성탄 담지 촉매가 비담지 촉매에 비해 촉매 손실이1/3~1/2로 감소해 활성탄에 촉매를 담지시킴으로써 내구성을 향상시킬 수 있었다.
Sodium borohydride, NaBH4, shows a number of advantages as hydrogen source for portable proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). Properties of NaBH4 hydrolysis reaction using activated carbon supported Co-B/C, Co-P-B/C catalyst were studied. BET surface area of catalyst, yield of hydrogen, effect of NaBH4 concentration and durability of catalyst were measured. The BET surface area of carbon supported catalyst was over 500 m2/g and this value was 2~3 times higher than that of unsupported catalyst. Hydrogen generation of activated carbon supported catalyst was more stable than that of unsupported catalyst. The activation energy of Co-P-B/C catalyst was 59.4 kJ/mol in 20 wt% NaBH4 and 14% lower than that of Co-P-B/FeCrAlloy catalyst. Catalyst loss on activated carbon supported catalyst was reduced to about 1/3~1/2 compared with unsupported catalyst, therefore durability was improved by supporting catalyst on activated carbon.
[References]
  1. Commercial Drones: 2015 to 2021, http//wintergreenresearch.com/reports/ Commercial UAS.html.
  2. Bradley TH, Moffitt BA, Mavris DN, Parekh DE, J. Power Sources, 171(2), 793, 2007
  3. Liu BH, Li ZP, J. Power Sources, 187(2), 527, 2009
  4. Fernandes R, Patel N, Miotello A, Filippi M, J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem., 298(1-2), 1, 2009
  5. Fernandes R, Patel N, Miotello A, Jaiswal R, Kothari DC, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 36(21), 13379, 2011
  6. Fernandes R, Patel N, Miotello A, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 92(1-2), 68, 2009
  7. Fernandes R, Patel N, Miotello A, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 34(7), 2893, 2009
  8. Moon GY, Lee SS, Yang GR, Song KH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 27(2), 474, 2010
  9. Demirci UB, Garin F, J. Alloy. Compd., 463, 107, 2008
  10. Simagina VI, Netskina OV, Komova OV, Odegova GV, Kochubei DI, Ishchenko AV, Kinetics Catalysis, 49(4), 568, 2008
  11. Ye W, Zhang HM, Xu DY, Ma L, Yi BL, J. Power Sources, 164(2), 544, 2007
  12. Simagina VI, Storozhenko PA, Netskina OV, Komova OV, Odegova GV, Samoilenko T, Yu, Gentsler AG, Kinetics Catalysis, 48(1), 168, 2007
  13. Demirci UB, Garin F, Catal. Commun., 9(6), 1167, 2008
  14. Chen Y, Kim H, Mater. Lett., 62, 1451, 2008
  15. Hwang B, Jo A, Sin S, Choi D, Nam S, Park K, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 51(1), 35, 2013
  16. Lee HR, Na IC, Park KP, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 54(5), 587, 2016
  17. Oh SJ, Jung HS, Jeong JJ, Na IC, Ahn HG, Park KP, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 53.(1), 11, 2015
  18. Hwang B, Jo J, Sin S, Choi D, Nam S, Park K, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 49(5), 516, 2011
  19. Hwang B, Jo A, Sin S, Choi D, Nam S, Park K, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 50(4), 627, 2012