Issue
Korean Chemical Engineering Research,
Vol.55, No.5, 652-659, 2017
Optimization of Extended UNIQUAC Parameter for Activity Coefficients of Ions of an Electrolyte System using Genetic Algorithms
In the present research, in order to predict activity coefficient of inorganic ions in electrolyte solution of a petroleum system, we studied 13 components in the electrolyte solution, including H2O, CO2 (aq), H+, Na+, Ba2+, Ca2+, Sr2+, Mg2+, SO4, CO3, OH-, Cl-, and HCO3. To predict the activity coefficient of the components of the petroleum system (a solid/liquid equilibrium system), activity coefficient model of Extended UNIQUAC was studied, along with its adjustable parameters optimized based on a genetic algorithm. The total calculated error associated with optimizing the adjustable parameters of Extended UNIQUAC model considering the 13 components under study at three temperature levels (298.15, 323.15, and 373.15 K) using the genetic algorithm is found to be 0.07.
[References]
  1. Muhlenbein H, Schlierkamp-Voosen D, Evolutionary Computation, 1(1), 25, 1993
  2. Fathian M, Amiri B, Maroosi A, Appl. Math. Computation, 190, 1502, 2007
  3. Fontane D, Proceeding of the Second Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference. Las Vegas, NV, USA(2001).
  4. Thomsen K, Rasmussen P, Chem. Eng. Sci., 54(12), 1787, 1999
  5. Abrams D, Prausnitz J, AIChE J., 21(1), 116, 1975
  6. Garcia AV, Thomsen K, Stenby EH, Geothermics, 34(1), 61, 2005
  7. Voss M, Foley C, Proceedings Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 99)(1999).
  8. Whitley D, Statistics computer, 4, 65, 1994
  9. Krishnamoorthy C, Venkatesh P, Sudarshan R, J. Comp. Civil Engineering, 16(1), 66, 2002
  10. Mitsuo G, Runwei C, Genetic algorithms and engineering design. Wiley(1997).
  11. Goldberg D, Genetic Algorithm in search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley(1989).
  12. Agrawal N, Rangaiah GP, Ray AK, Gupta SK, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45(9), 3182, 2006
  13. Cao K, Feng X, Ma H, Comput. Chem. Eng., 31(12), 1565, 2007
  14. Elliott L, Ingham D, Kyne A, Mera N, Pourkashanian M, Wilson C, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 128(2), 255-263(2006).
  15. Jezowski J, Bochenek R, Poplewski G, Chem. Eng. Process., 46(11), 1160, 2007
  16. Boozarjomehry RB, Masoori M, Chem. Eng. J., 130(1), 29, 2007
  17. Till J, Sand G, Urselmann M, Engell S, Comput. Chem. Eng., 31(5-6), 630, 2007
  18. Young CT, Zheng Y, Yeh CW, Jang SS, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 46, 1529, 2007
  19. Lepar YY, Wang YC, Chang CT, Comput. Chem. Eng., 101, 167, 2017
  20. Garcia AV, Thomsen K, Stenby EH, Geothermics, 35(3), 239, 2006
  21. Ghasemi M, Ghavidel S, Rahmani S, Roosta A, Falah H, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 29, 54, 2014
  22. Yonggang C, Fengjie Y, Jigui S, J. Jilin University, 24(2), 181, 2006
  23. Clerc M, Kennedy J, IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation, 6(1), 58, 2002
  24. Basturk B, Karaboga D, IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, May 12-14, Indianapolis, IN, USA(2006).
  25. Karaboga D, Basturk B, J. Global Optimization, 39, 459, 2007
  26. Karaboga D, Basturk B, Appl. Soft Computing, 8, 687, 2008
  27. Templeton C, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 514-516(1960).
  28. Vetter O, Vandenbroeck I, Nayberg J, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 271-281(1983).