상용차용 수소 전기 차량 수요가 증가하면서 고분자 전해질 연료전지 (PEMFC) 내구성은 승용차용보다 5배 이상 증

가해야 하므로 내구성 향상 연구개발이 시급한 상황이다. PEMFC 막전극접합체 (MEA)가 화학적 열화가 진행되면

MEA 두께가 감소하고 핀홀이 발생하기도 한다. 본 연구에서는 화학적 열화 가속 실험인 개회로전압 (OCV) holding

후에 단위전지의 체결압을 상승시키면서 MEA의 성능 및 내구성의 변화를 측정하였다. 체결압이 상승하면서 고분자

막의 저항과 막/전극 접촉저항이 감소하여 I-V 성능이 향상되었고, 수소투과도가 감소하였다. 수소투과도 감소에 따라

OCV는 증가하였다. 핀홀 부위를 제거하고 MEA 체결압을 증가시켰을 때 수소투과도가 급감하여 국부적인 열화가 전

체 셀의 성능과 내구성에 미치는 영향이 큼을 확인하였다. 핀홀 부위 제거 후 재체결하고 OCV holding 평가를 하였

을 때 막 저항과 수소투과도 감소에 따라 내구성이 향상됨을 확인하였다.

As the demand for hydrogen electric vehicles for commercial vehicles increases, the durability of PEMFCs must increase more than five times that of passenger cars, so research and development to improve durability is urgent. When the PEMFC membrane electrode assembly (MEA) undergoes chemical degradation, the MEA thickness decreases and pinholes occur. In this study, changes in the performance and durability of the MEA were measured while increasing the clamping pressure of the unit cell after open circuit voltage (OCV) holding, an accelerated chemical degradation experiment. As the clamping pressure increased, the resistance of the polymer membrane and the membrane/electrode contact resistance decreased, improving the I-V performance and reducing the hydrogen permeability. As the hydrogen permeability decreased, the OCV increased. When the pinhole area was removed and the MEA clamping pressure was increased, the hydrogen permeability decreased sharply, confirming that the local degradation has a large effect on the performance and durability of the entire cell. When the pinhole was removed and re-clamping and OCV holding was evaluated, it was confirmed that the durability improved according to the decrease in membrane resistance and hydrogen permeability.

PEMFC, Membrane degradation, Thickness decrease, Clamping pressure, OCV holding

1. Wang, G., Yu, Y., Liu, H., Gong, C., Wen, S., Wang, X. and Tu,
Z., “Progress on Design and Development of Polymer Electrolyte
Membrane Fuel Cell Systems for Vehicle Applications: A
Review,” Fuel Processing Technology, 179, 203-228(2018).
2. Department of Energy, https://www.energy.gov/(2016).
3. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization,
http://www.nedo.go.jp/english/index.html(2016).
4. Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technology Platform in the European
Union, www.HFP.europe.org(2016).
5. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of
China, http://www.most.go.vcn/eng(2016).
6. Marcinkoski, J., Vijayagopal, R., Adams, J., James, B., Kopasz,
J., Kopasz and Ahluwalia, R., DOE Advanced Truck Technologies,
Subsection of the Electrified Powertrain Roadmap,https://
hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/19006_hydrogen_class8_long_haul_
truck_targets.pdf.
7. Wilkinson, D. P. and St-Pierre, J., in: W. Vielstich, H. A. Gasteiger,
A. Lamm (Eds.). Handbook of Fuel Cell: Fundamentals Technology
and Applications, Vol. 3, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester,
England, 611-612(2003).
8. Collier, A., Wang, H., Yaun, X., Zhang, J. and Wilison, D. P.,
“Degradation of Polymer Electrolyte Membranes,” Int. J. Hydrogen
Energy, 31(13), 1838-1854(2006).
9. Watanabe, M., Tsurumi, K., Mizukami, T., Nakamura, T. and
Stonehart, P., “Activity and Stability of Ordered and Disordered
Co-Pt Alloys for Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cells,” J. Electrochem.
Soc., 141(10), 2659-2668(1994).
10. Akita, T., Taniguchi, A., Maekawa, J., Siroma, Z., Tanaka, K.,
Kohyama, M. and Yasuda, K., “Analytical TEM Study of Pt Particle
Deposition in the Proton-exchange Membrane of a Membrane
electrode-Assembly,” J. Power Sources, 159(1), 461-467(2006).
11. Zhai, Y., Zhang, H., Xing, D. and Shao, Z., “The Stability of Pt/C
Catalyst in H3PO4/PBI PEMFC During High Temperature Life
Test,” J. Power Sources, 164(1), 126-133(2006).
12. Sharma, R. and Andersen, S. M., “An Opinion on Catalyst Degradation
Mechanisms During Catalyst Support Focused Accelerated
Stress Test (AST) for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells
(PEMFCs),” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 239, 636-643
(2018).
13. Kaddouri, A. E., Flandin, L. and Bas, C., “Chemical Degradation
of PFSA Ionomer Binder in PEMFC's Catalyst Layer,” Int.
J. Hydrogen Energy, 43, 15386-15397(2018).
14. Morawietz, T., Handl, M., Oldani, C., Gazdzicki, P., Hunger, J.,
Wilhelm, F., Blake, J., Friedrich, K. A. and Hiesgen, R., “High-
Resolution Analysis of Ionomer Loss in Catalytic Layers after
Operation,” J. of Electrochem. Soc., 165(6), F3139-F3147(2018).
15. Daido University, Ritsumeikian Univ., Tokyo Institute of Technology,
Japan Automobile Research Ins., “Cell Evaluation and
Analysis Protocol Guidline,” NEDO, Development of PEFC
Technologies for Commercial Promotion-PEFC Evaluation Project,
January 30(2014).
16. Yoo, D. G., Hwang, B. C., Oh, S. H. and Park, K. P. “Acceleration
of Electrolyte Membrane Degradation by Frequent Activation in
PEMFC Electrochemical Durability Evaluation,” Korean J. Chem.
Eng., 40(8), 2004-2009(2023).
17. Barbir, F., “PEM Fuel Cells: Theory and Practice,” Elsvier Academic
Press, San Diego, 2005.
18. Oh, S. H., Gwon, J. H., Lim, D. H. and Park, K. P., “Study on
the Short Resistance and Shorting of Membrane of PEMFC,”
Korean Chem. Eng. Res., Vol. 62, No. 1, February, 2024
Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 59(1), 6-10(2021).
19. Ohma, A., Suga, S., Yamamoto, S., Shinohara., “Membrane Degradation
Behavior during Open-Circuit Voltage Hold Test,” J. Electrochem.
Soc., 154(8), B757-B760(2007).